|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Introduction by Shinmyo Koshin
Since ancient times, humanity has gazed at the Moon and imagined stories. In Japan, we speak of Princess Kaguya, a being from beyond this world. Yet the Moon is not only myth. It is guardian, vault, and teacher. The guardians once told me: ‘The Moon is hollow, alive with rivers and mountains inside. It was placed to shield the Earth, to guide humanity’s heart.’
In these conversations, I do not stand apart as moderator. I walk among you as witness. Together with scientists, mystics, and voices from beyond, we ask: is the Moon natural or engineered? Is it hiding secrets, protecting life, guiding DNA? These are not idle fantasies. They are invitations to look deeper — into the Moon, into Earth, and into our own sincerity, magokoro.
Let us begin.
(Note: This is an imaginary conversation, a creative exploration of an idea, and not a real speech or event.)
Is the Moon Hollow or Artificially Engineered?
Participants:
Shinmyo Koshin (moderator & participant)
Dr. Sean C. Solomon — planetary scientist, NASA advisor on lunar structure
Dr. John Brandenburg — physicist open to ET hypotheses in planetary science
Linda Moulton Howe — investigative journalist, UFO researcher
Ingo Swann — remote viewer (psychic impressions of the Moon)
Bashar — channeled ET consciousness
Opening by Shinmyo Koshin
“Brothers and sisters, we begin with a question that has stirred both scientists and mystics: is the Moon truly natural, or was it engineered? The Apollo missions reported that when struck, the Moon rang like a bell, echoing as if hollow. Ancient myths tell us of it being remade as a sanctuary. Let us ask: if the Moon is not what we are told, what does it mean for humanity?”
Question 1 — If seismic data suggests the Moon ‘rang like a bell,’ could this be evidence of a hollow or engineered structure?
Linda Moulton Howe:
“The phrase ‘rang like a bell’ is not just poetic. Apollo 12 and 13 seismographs recorded reverberations lasting over an hour. That’s unlike any natural body we know. Some engineers told me privately they suspected a hollow shell — not empty, but constructed. If so, the Moon may be a machine, not a rock.”
Dr. Sean Solomon:
“As a scientist, I must clarify: the Moon’s seismic echoes are unusual, yes, but they can be explained by its dry, fractured crust transmitting vibrations differently than Earth’s. Hollow? No. Engineered? That stretches the data. Still, anomalies remain — and science cannot dismiss what it does not yet explain.”
Ingo Swann:
“When I remote viewed the Moon, I saw structures inside — tunnels, chambers, luminous areas. I also saw beings working there. The ringing is consistent with what I perceived: an artificial shell around a hollow interior, with energy fields amplifying vibration. To me, the data matches the psychic impressions.”
Dr. John Brandenburg:
“As a physicist, I admit the ringing is peculiar. A hollow structure is one explanation. Another is that the Moon has internal geometry unusual for a natural satellite. Could an advanced intelligence have engineered it? It cannot be ruled out. I’ve argued Mars bore signs of catastrophe. Why not the Moon as construction?”
Bashar:
“Yes, the Moon is engineered. Not entirely hollow, but structured. Think of it as a vessel — part natural body, part artificial modification. The resonance you detect is not coincidence; it was designed to stabilize the Moon’s orbit and to create a protective frequency around Earth. You are sensing its function.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“When I was told by the guardians, they said: the Moon was remade after Kaguya-hime’s exile, hollowed and filled with rivers, mountains, even gardens. The ringing is not error. It is confirmation. The Moon is not just stone, but sanctuary.”
Question 2 — What purpose would a hollow Moon serve — defense, observation, or something else entirely?
Dr. John Brandenburg:
“From a military or scientific standpoint, a hollow or engineered Moon would serve as an observation post. Its orbit is perfect for monitoring Earth. Too perfect. Some have suggested it was ‘parked’ there. Defense is plausible too — intercepting meteors, stabilizing Earth’s axis. If so, then someone wanted life on Earth to survive.”
Bashar:
“The primary purpose is guardianship. The Moon was placed to maintain the balance of Earth’s biosphere — stabilizing tides, shielding from impacts, aligning consciousness cycles. Inside, yes, resources are stored, but its true role is energetic: a tuning fork for Earth’s frequency. It hums, and you hum with it.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“I’ve spoken with whistleblowers who claimed the Moon is used as a control station — monitoring human activity. It’s both defense and surveillance. If it is a sanctuary, then why do we not see what’s inside? Because we are not yet meant to. The purpose is protection, but also management.”
Dr. Sean Solomon:
“I respect the speculation, but as a scientist, I emphasize: the Moon’s purpose, as we know, is gravitational. Without it, Earth’s axis would wobble dangerously. Whether artificial or not, its presence is vital. To call it defense or observation — that is metaphor. But perhaps metaphor hides truth.”
Ingo Swann:
“When I looked, the purpose was clear: activity inside was not passive. They were building, storing, preserving. I saw large crystals amplifying energy. It is a library, a vault, a fortress. Perhaps all three. Its guardians were not hostile, but vigilant. The Moon watches.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: it is defense, but also sanctuary. They said, ‘We placed the Moon to keep Earth safe, to shield it from destruction, and to preserve what must survive.’ Rivers and forests are within, waiting. The Moon is Earth’s ark.”
Question 3 — How would humanity’s worldview change if the Moon were proven artificial?
Carl Sagan (joining here as a guest voice):
“To learn the Moon is artificial would transform our sense of solitude. We would know we are not alone. We would be forced to see ourselves as children under watch. Awe would grow — but so would fear. How we respond would reveal our maturity.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“If this truth came out, it would shatter trust in governments, because they have known and kept it hidden. Humanity would be forced to reframe myths — Princess Kaguya as not just story, but memory. We would realize our history has been managed.”
Dr. Sean Solomon:
“As a scientist, I’d welcome the discovery — it would expand physics, cosmology, planetary science beyond measure. But I fear society might collapse under the weight of knowing we are observed, protected, perhaps controlled. Knowledge is liberating, but it is also destabilizing.”
Bashar:
“It would free you. The moment you accept the Moon as artificial, you accept you are part of a larger cosmic network. Fear will be temporary. Belonging will last. Your worldview will expand from isolation to kinship.”
Ingo Swann:
“Proving it artificial would validate countless psychic impressions, myths, intuitions. It would remind humanity that truth was always whispering in our stories. The shock would fade. The knowing would remain: we are not abandoned.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians said: when humanity learns the truth, it will divide. Some will reject it in fear. Others will embrace it in gratitude. But those who live with magokoro, true heart, will not be shaken. They will say: we have always known.”
Closing by Shinmyo Koshin
“Whether through science, psychic vision, or ET voices, one truth emerges: the Moon is not silent rock. It is sanctuary, guardian, ark. Its ringing, its orbit, its presence — all testify to intention. One day, humanity will see within. Until then, let us remember: sincerity is the key. With magokoro, the truth will not destroy us, but awaken us.”
Topic 2 — The Moon as a Storage Vault of Earth’s Elements
Participants:
Shinmyo Koshin — Japanese spiritual teacher, connecting Kaguya myth with lunar guardianship.
Dr. Paul Spudis — NASA lunar geologist, expert on Moon’s water and minerals.
Dolores Cannon — regression hypnotherapist, who reported ET messages about Earth preservation.
Arcturian Council — channeled higher-dimensional ET collective.
Kenji Miyazawa — Japanese poet-mystic, weaving cosmic imagery with Earth’s cycles.
Linda Moulton Howe — investigative journalist, UFO/ET researcher.
Opening by Shinmyo Koshin
“When I was taught by the guardians, they said: the Moon is not empty. Inside, there are rivers, mountains, even forests — a vault where Earth’s plants, minerals, and water have been carried. It is a sanctuary, a backup of life. Tonight, we ask: is the Moon truly a storage vault, and if so, why? Let us begin.”
Question 1 — Could extraterrestrials or guardians be transporting minerals, plants, and even DNA into the Moon for safekeeping?
Dr. Paul Spudis:
“We know from data: the Moon contains significant amounts of water ice in craters, and mineral deposits rich in titanium, iron, and rare elements. But the idea of plants or DNA stored there? That is beyond current science. If ETs exist, and if they sought a secure repository, the Moon would be logical. It is close to Earth, geologically stable, and shielded by vacuum. From a purely strategic perspective, it makes sense.”
Dolores Cannon:
“Through my regressions, I heard again and again from clients: the Moon is not dead. It is a place where guardians have stored the seed of life. Minerals, plants, even genetic records from Earth are kept there, not only for preservation, but for eventual re-seeding should catastrophe strike. Humanity’s memory of this is embedded in myths — like Princess Kaguya.”
Arcturian Council:
“Yes, what you suspect is true. The Moon holds libraries of Earth’s essence. DNA, crystalline records, plant seeds, and mineral codes are preserved. They were placed there by higher civilizations, not to hide, but to ensure continuity. When Earth experiences great cycles of renewal — floods, fire, ice — the Moon remains as the caretaker.”
Kenji Miyazawa:
“In my visions, I saw the cosmos as a great orchard. Planets bloom and wither, yet the gardener always keeps seeds. The Moon is such a jar of seeds, carried across silence. The flowers of Earth — rice, pine, chrysanthemum — may have their echoes in that vault, waiting for dawn after the storm.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“I have interviewed whistleblowers who claimed the Moon is a staging ground. They said alien craft transport biological material there — samples of plants, blood, even entire genetic blueprints. If true, this makes the Moon a Noah’s Ark, hidden in plain sight. Mainstream science will deny it, but classified programs may already know.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me directly: plants, minerals, water — all have been taken inside. It is not speculation, but testimony. They said, ‘If Earth falls, life will rise again from the Moon’s womb.’ The Moon is ark, library, and guardian.”
Question 2 — Why would Earth’s elements need to be preserved — preparation for catastrophe, or part of a larger cosmic plan?
Dolores Cannon:
“The answer is both. Catastrophes are part of Earth’s cycles, but guardians intervene to ensure that humanity and life are not lost forever. The Moon holds Earth’s memory, so when destruction comes — whether from human folly or natural disaster — renewal can begin.”
Dr. Paul Spudis:
“As a scientist, I will say this: catastrophes are inevitable. Asteroid impacts, volcanic upheavals, climate extremes — all have shaped Earth’s past. If an intelligence saw value in humanity or Earth’s biosphere, preserving its elements would be rational. Whether it is happening, I cannot prove. But the logic of redundancy is sound.”
Arcturian Council:
“You must understand: Earth is part of a larger experiment in consciousness. Preservation of minerals and plants is not only biological — it is energetic. The codes within these materials are unique. They are keys for the galactic network. If lost, the orchestra of creation loses a note. The Moon safeguards the harmony.”
Kenji Miyazawa:
“Floods, earthquakes, wars — all these I saw in the fields of my homeland. Yet always, rice sprouted again, flowers bloomed again. Perhaps the cosmos, too, keeps such faith. To preserve seeds is to believe in tomorrow. The Moon is a tomorrow box.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“The larger plan may involve more than survival. Some sources suggest humanity itself was seeded here, and the Moon is both a monitoring station and a storage facility. If so, then the preservation is not optional — it is part of an ongoing experiment, one in which humans are participants but not the architects.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: Earth will face cycles of fire and water. To preserve is not fear, but love. They said: ‘If humans remember magokoro — true heart — we will restore what is lost. If they forget, even what is stored cannot save them.’ Preservation is conditional upon sincerity.”
Question 3 — If true, does this mean humanity is already being protected from future extinction?
Arcturian Council:
“Yes. You are already protected, but not in the way you think. Protection is not rescue from every pain. Protection is ensuring your species continues, that the melody of your DNA remains in the universe. Extinction is not your fate — but transformation is.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“If humanity is being protected, then why do catastrophes still come? Perhaps the protection is not from pain, but from annihilation. Whistleblowers spoke of ET intervention during nuclear events, or disasters where unseen lights prevented worse outcomes. If the Moon holds Earth’s backups, then yes — humanity is safeguarded, but conditionally.”
Dr. Paul Spudis:
“I hesitate to use the word ‘protected.’ But consider: the Moon absorbs impacts that would devastate Earth. If its role is intentional, then yes — some form of shielding exists. Whether aliens are involved, I cannot say. But extinction has not yet come, despite countless risks. Perhaps that is not coincidence.”
Dolores Cannon:
“You are protected, but your consciousness determines the form. Those who live with love, gratitude, and sincerity will be carried forward. Those who refuse to awaken will not. The vault is not merely material — it is vibrational. It preserves the frequency of those ready for the new Earth.”
Kenji Miyazawa:
“In my imagination, the Moon is a shepherd walking beside Earth, guarding its flock. Protection is not the absence of wolves, but the guidance through storms. Humanity is guided, not spared. To believe otherwise is to misunderstand the poetry of survival.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians said: ‘We will protect those who live with true heart. We will not protect those who betray sincerity.’ Humanity is not abandoned. The vault is proof. But survival is not only body — it is spirit. Only magokoro ensures both.”
Closing by Shinmyo Koshin
“We see many voices agree: the Moon as vault is not fantasy, but probability, even testimony. Science sees stability. Mystics see memory. ET voices speak of preservation. The guardians told me: life is stored, but life must also be lived with sincerity. Without magokoro, even a vault cannot save us. With magokoro, humanity will never be lost.”
Topic 3 — The Locked Face of the Moon: Rotation or Illusion?
Participants:
Shinmyo Koshin — Japanese spiritual teacher, referencing NASA’s remark that “the surface does not move.”
Dr. Christopher C. Kraft Jr. — NASA’s first flight director, representing mainstream aerospace skepticism.
James Oberg — space journalist and NASA historian, skeptical but open to anomalies.
Carl Jung — depth psychologist, exploring archetypes and symbolism.
Council of Nine — channeled ET collective, addressing cosmic cloaking and concealment.
Linda Moulton Howe — UFO researcher, drawing on whistleblower claims of lunar secrets.
Opening by Shinmyo Koshin
“The Moon never turns its face away from Earth. For thousands of years, we see the same side, unmoving, as if locked. Scientists call it tidal locking, but some from NASA have quietly admitted: the surface does not move as expected. Could it be illusion? Could technology hide the truth? Let us ask together.”
Question 1 — Why does the Moon always show the same face to Earth — is it natural physics, or evidence of artificial control?
James Oberg:
“Tidal locking is well understood: gravitational interaction slows a satellite’s rotation until one hemisphere faces its planet permanently. This is common in astronomy. Many moons are tidally locked. But I admit: the perfection of Earth-Moon alignment is uncanny. It raises the question — was it natural coincidence, or designed?”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“When I spoke with the guardians, they said: what you see is not what truly is. The face is fixed by intention, not accident. The Moon is adjusted, positioned, held in place by technology beyond us. It is not merely orbit. It is management.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“Whistleblowers told me: the Moon’s orientation is deliberate. They claimed cloaking systems project the same surface, making it appear constant. Could it be natural? Possibly. But the reports I gathered suggest something more: someone doesn’t want us to see the entrances on the far side.”
Dr. Christopher C. Kraft Jr.:
“As a NASA engineer, I cannot entertain the idea of artificial control lightly. The physics explain the face-lock well enough. Yet, anomalies in orbital data exist. Could advanced technology adjust rotation? Yes, in theory. But I never saw evidence during my tenure.”
Carl Jung:
“To the psyche, the unchanging face of the Moon is archetype: constancy, the eternal mother, the witness. Whether natural or engineered, humanity projects meaning. If artificial, then our archetype is not illusion, but intention — placed there to speak to our unconscious.”
Council of Nine:
“It is deliberate. The Moon is a stage. What you see is chosen. The other face conceals bases, archives, guardians. Cloaking technology ensures humanity only sees what it is ready for. The unchanging face is not physics, but pedagogy — a lesson in patience.”
Question 2 — NASA scientists have noted the surface ‘does not move as expected.’ What could this mean?
Linda Moulton Howe:
“It could mean seismic sensors picked up stability beyond natural tolerance — almost as if the crust was anchored. Some sources claimed the Moon’s rotation is stabilized by internal machinery. That would explain why we never see drift.”
Dr. Christopher C. Kraft Jr.:
“What I recall was less dramatic. The Moon’s libration — its small oscillation — is minimal. Some expected more. The ‘does not move’ phrasing may refer to its stability. But to jump from stability to machines — that’s speculation.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: the reason the surface appears unmoving is because technology projects the same image, like a mirror. Behind the projection, things move — ships, lights, entrances. But the surface is locked in image to prevent discovery.”
Carl Jung:
“If the surface is ‘too still,’ it reminds me of dreams where a mask hides the true face. The psyche knows something is concealed. The Moon, too, may wear a mask, reflecting our fear of what is hidden.”
Council of Nine:
“It means what you suspect: you are not meant to see. The motion is corrected, compensated, by energy fields. The Moon is a guardian. Guardians do not reveal their doors. Until humanity grows in sincerity, the face will remain unchanged.”
James Oberg:
“If anomalies exist, they deserve rigorous study. I’ve seen NASA dismiss oddities too quickly. But extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I’d ask: who benefits from the illusion? If it exists, then yes, someone is watching.”
Question 3 — Could cloaking or projection technology be concealing entrances, bases, or entire structures on the far side?
Council of Nine:
“Yes. The far side holds structures, some ancient, some active. Cloaking ensures humanity cannot yet enter. Projection shields create the illusion of rock. Entrances open only to those invited. This is why you cannot photograph them with clarity.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“Testimonies I’ve collected say there are hangars, vast towers, and machines on the far side. Cloaking fields distort photographs. Astronauts may have seen more than they admitted. Concealment is not fantasy — it is policy.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: the far side is womb. Inside is the sanctuary of life. Cloaking exists, yes, but it is not to harm. It is to wait. They said: ‘When humanity lives with true heart, the doors will open. Not before.’”
James Oberg:
“I must caution: extraordinary tales of bases are unverified. Cloaking? Hard to prove. Yet, classified Apollo photos exist. What if some images showed anomalies? Concealment may not be technology, but bureaucracy.”
Carl Jung:
“Whether physical bases or symbolic cloaking, the theme is the same: humanity is not yet ready to face the whole truth. The psyche cannot bear sudden revelation. Masks are removed slowly. Perhaps the Moon wears such a mask.”
Dr. Christopher C. Kraft Jr.:
“As an engineer, I never encountered cloaking fields. But I can’t rule out that there are things on the far side we did not reveal. The silence around the far side is louder than words. Sometimes, absence is its own signal.”
Closing by Shinmyo Koshin
“Whether through science or spirit, all voices agree: the Moon shows us only what we are meant to see. Perhaps it is physics. Perhaps it is guardianship. Perhaps both. The locked face may be mask or miracle. But one truth remains: until humanity awakens with sincerity, magokoro, the other side will stay hidden. When the time comes, the Moon will turn, and the true face will shine.”
Topic 4 — The Moon as Earth’s Defense System
Participants:
Shinmyo Koshin — Japanese spiritual teacher, linking Princess Kaguya to lunar guardianship.
James Lovelock — scientist who proposed the Gaia Hypothesis (Earth as self-regulating).
Masahiro Mori — Buddhist roboticist, famous for “uncanny valley,” reflecting on spiritual technology.
Dōgen Zenji — Zen master (13th century), voice of nature as Dharma.
Elohim — channeled ET guardianship perspective.
Linda Moulton Howe — UFO researcher, reporting on ET involvement in planetary defense.
Opening by Shinmyo Koshin
“The guardians once told me: the Moon was placed not only as sanctuary, but as shield. It catches meteors, steadies Earth’s orbit, and prevents destruction. Without the Moon, Earth would be chaos. Tonight, let us ask: is the Moon truly a defense system, and if so, who maintains it?”
Question 1 — Could the Moon be deliberately placed or engineered to shield Earth from meteors and stabilize its orbit?
James Lovelock:
“As I proposed in the Gaia Hypothesis, Earth regulates itself like a living organism. The Moon may be part of this system. Its size, its orbit, its role in stabilizing Earth’s axis are extraordinary. If engineered, it would be the most elegant ecological intervention ever known.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians said: yes, it was placed. They spoke of Princess Kaguya’s lineage shaping the Moon as protector. Rivers inside sustain life, while the shell absorbs impacts. The Moon’s orbit is not coincidence, but care.”
Masahiro Mori:
“To me, technology is not separate from spirit. If the Moon was engineered, it is a spiritual machine — a robot of nature. It stabilizes Earth’s tides, allowing life to flourish. This is no accident. In Buddhist thought, form and emptiness dance. The Moon is form of protection, emptiness of intent.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“Evidence exists: the Moon’s size relative to Earth is unique in the solar system. Its orbit is too perfect. Whistleblowers have said the Moon was ‘parked.’ If true, this is not natural. Someone wanted Earth to survive. That is defense, deliberate and ancient.”
Elohim:
“We placed it. Not we alone, but with others. The Moon is shield and anchor. Without it, Earth’s seas would rage, its poles would wander, and its children would perish. It was set as guardian, a gift, not to enslave, but to sustain.”
Dōgen Zenji:
“In mountains and rivers, Dharma speaks. The Moon too is Dharma. Whether natural or placed, it shields not by will, but by being. When you see its light, know it has always been guiding the rhythm of Earth’s breathing. Its placement is Buddha’s compassion.”
Question 2 — Are natural disasters and cosmic impacts random, or are they being regulated by unseen guardians?
Linda Moulton Howe:
“Many accounts suggest guardians intervene. UFOs near nuclear plants, strange lights before disasters. Could the same apply to cosmic events? Perhaps meteors that would have struck Earth were diverted, absorbed by the Moon’s hidden side. Guardianship may already be active.”
Elohim:
“Yes. What you call random is regulated. Some impacts we allow — they are catalysts for change. Others, too destructive, are absorbed. The Moon takes the blows so Earth’s children can continue. It is not luck. It is choice.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: disasters are not punishment, but teaching. Yet extinction is not permitted. The Moon balances destruction with mercy. In silence, it receives stones of fire that were never meant for Earth’s soil.”
James Lovelock:
“As a scientist, I frame this differently: disasters are essential to Earth’s self-regulation. Mass extinctions renew ecosystems. Yet if guardians exist, perhaps they are part of Gaia’s intelligence, ensuring destruction never exceeds renewal. In that sense, randomness is an illusion.”
Masahiro Mori:
“In robotics, control is both program and improvisation. Guardians may be like cosmic engineers — programming thresholds. Disasters refine humanity, but annihilation is outside the program. In this, the Moon is code of protection written into Earth’s design.”
Dōgen Zenji:
“In Zen, storms and earthquakes are Dharma. They teach impermanence. Yet the guardianship is also Dharma. Compassion regulates suffering. The Moon’s shield is compassion in form. Randomness and regulation are not separate — they are two wings of the same bird.”
Question 3 — If the Moon functions as a defense system, what does this reveal about Earth’s importance in the larger cosmos?
Elohim:
“It reveals Earth is sacred. Not unique, but rare. A garden, planted with intention. Its DNA is library, its people are seeds. To defend Earth is to defend the cosmic song. Without Earth’s note, the harmony weakens.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians said: Japan is protected by Kaguya’s lineage, but Earth itself is loved by many. The Moon’s defense shows humanity is not alone. You are children watched over, though often unaware. The importance is not power, but sincerity — magokoro. Earth is precious because of its heart.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“From whistleblower testimony, Earth is a genetic treasure house. That explains intervention. The Moon as defense system is evidence Earth is part of a much larger plan. We are not just observers of evolution — we are participants in a guarded project.”
James Lovelock:
“Scientifically, Earth is rare — complex life is not common. If defended, it means intelligence values what has emerged here. It places us within a larger ecology of the cosmos, one we barely perceive.”
Masahiro Mori:
“If Earth is defended, then humanity is beloved. A robot defends its master. The Moon is robot of the cosmos, built to serve life. This means humanity is not accidental. You are cared for by unseen engineers.”
Dōgen Zenji:
“In Buddhism we say: ‘This very Earth is the Lotus Land of Purity.’ To see the Moon as defense is to see the universe itself practicing compassion. Earth is important, not for wealth or dominion, but for awakening. Its defense is proof of love.”
Closing by Shinmyo Koshin
“Tonight we see the Moon not as stone, but as shield. Some say science explains it. Others say guardians placed it. The guardians told me: both are true. Science describes, guardians preserve. Earth is important, not because it is strong, but because it is sincere. With magokoro, true heart, Earth will continue to be shielded. Without it, even the Moon cannot save us.”
Topic 5 — The Moon’s Hidden Far Side and Forbidden Access
Participants:
Shinmyo Koshin — Japanese spiritual teacher, linking myths of Kaguya with cloaking and guardianship.
Edgar Mitchell — Apollo astronaut, open about ET presence and secrecy.
Linda Moulton Howe — investigative journalist, researching whistleblowers on lunar bases.
Ingo Swann — remote viewer, who described ET structures on the far side of the Moon.
Ashtar — channeled ET commander, claiming to oversee bases of light.
Dr. Christopher Kraft Jr. — NASA’s first flight director, skeptical but authoritative voice.
Opening by Shinmyo Koshin
“The Moon shows us only one face. The far side, hidden from Earth, has long been the subject of mystery. The guardians told me: cloaking technologies conceal entrances, structures, even entire landscapes. NASA admitted: what we see may be projection. Tonight we ask: why is the far side forbidden, and what lies beyond the veil?”
Question 1 — Why has the far side of the Moon remained so hidden, even in the age of satellites and exploration?
Edgar Mitchell:
“I walked on the Moon. I know what it feels like to look into that silence. There were things we saw — lights, anomalies — that were never reported. The far side is not just hidden by orbit. It’s hidden by policy. We were told: don’t ask. Don’t report. The silence was deliberate.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: the far side is womb. Entrances to the inner sanctuary are there. They project the same surface image on both sides so humans cannot find the doors. The hiding is not deception, but protection. Humanity is not yet ready.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“I’ve interviewed people who worked in classified programs. They said the far side is occupied. Towers, hangars, bases. Why hidden? Because governments fear panic. Because ETs require secrecy. The far side is forbidden, not empty.”
Ingo Swann:
“When I remote viewed the far side, I saw large structures, glowing domes, and beings who became aware I was watching. They looked back at me. The reason it is hidden is simple: we are not welcome. It is not our territory.”
Ashtar:
“The far side is home to bases of light, places where higher councils oversee Earth’s development. It is hidden not from cruelty, but from timing. Humanity must first learn unity before being shown what is there. The veil is mercy.”
Dr. Christopher Kraft Jr.:
“I must stress: orbital mapping of the far side exists. Satellites have photographed it. What people interpret as structures may be geology. That said, I acknowledge: there are gaps in public data. Classified imagery exists. Why not share everything? That is the true question.”
Question 2 — Are governments and space agencies withholding knowledge of structures, bases, or ET presence on the far side?
Linda Moulton Howe:
“Yes. The testimony is overwhelming. Whistleblowers described photos of vast towers and machinery. Some said NASA deliberately airbrushed or blacked out anomalies before public release. If there are bases, governments know. They are withholding, because disclosure would shatter control.”
Edgar Mitchell:
“I was not told directly, but I learned enough to suspect. ET presence is real. Our military complex hides it. The far side is the perfect staging ground. No direct view from Earth, easy to keep secret. Yes, knowledge is withheld.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians said: secrecy is not only by humans, but by them. They asked governments not to reveal, for humanity’s consciousness is not ready. If bases are known, war would follow. Secrecy is protection, not conspiracy alone.”
Ingo Swann:
“When I viewed it, I felt the secrecy not as suppression, but as boundary. Like a fence around a sacred temple. Governments may hide, yes, but the greater concealment is not theirs to decide. It belongs to those who built the far side.”
Ashtar:
“Yes, there are bases. Yes, governments know. Yes, they conceal. But concealment is temporary. When humanity learns magokoro — true sincerity — then secrecy will end. The far side will be revealed in full.”
Dr. Christopher Kraft Jr.:
“I know conspiracies swirl around NASA. I won’t endorse them. But I admit: some Apollo images were not released. Some information remains classified. Was it ET presence, or Cold War secrecy? Perhaps both. What is withheld may be more than humans can yet accept.”
Question 3 — What would humanity gain — or risk — by openly exploring the forbidden regions of the Moon?
Ashtar:
“Humanity would gain kinship, knowledge, and entry into the galactic community. But you risk arrogance. If you come with greed or conquest, you will not be welcomed. The far side is a threshold. Cross with purity, or not at all.”
Linda Moulton Howe:
“Disclosure would transform everything. We would know humanity is not alone. We would understand that myths — Princess Kaguya, lunar gods — were echoes of truth. But we risk upheaval. Governments fear loss of control. Religions fear loss of narrative. That is why access is forbidden.”
Edgar Mitchell:
“We would gain clarity. We would no longer live in lies. We would risk destabilization — but the truth is worth it. Humanity cannot grow in denial. We must face what is there.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians said: gain comes with readiness. If humanity sees too soon, it will respond with fear, weapons, and division. If humanity waits until sincerity awakens, it will respond with reverence. What is risked is war. What is gained is kinship.”
Ingo Swann:
“I can tell you what I felt: awe. The far side is alive. The gain is wonder. The risk is madness, if one enters unprepared. The mind must be still, or the sight will break it.”
Dr. Christopher Kraft Jr.:
“As engineer, I think of practical risks. If there are installations, human or non-human, to intrude could provoke conflict. But to explore would advance science beyond measure. The question is not can we, but should we — and when.”
Closing by Shinmyo Koshin
“Whether astronaut, scientist, psychic, or guardian, all agree: the far side holds secrets. Governments conceal, yes. But greater concealment comes from the guardians themselves. Humanity will one day see. Until then, the Moon teaches patience. When magokoro, true heart, is restored, the far side will no longer be forbidden. It will become a bridge.”
Topic 6 — The Moon’s Role in Humanity’s Spiritual & Genetic Evolution
Participants:
- Shinmyo Koshin — Japanese spiritual teacher, emphasizing magokoro (true heart) as the key.
- Motoori Norinaga — Edo-period scholar, interpreter of magokoro in Shinto and myth.
- Carl Sagan — scientist, voice of awe in cosmic perspective.
- Yuval Noah Harari — historian, reflecting on myth and technology shaping destiny.
- Bashar — channeled ET, describing DNA upgrades and vibrational influence.
- Princess Kaguya (mythic voice) — as archetypal exile and cosmic witness.
Opening by Shinmyo Koshin
“The guardians told me: the Moon is not only shield or vault, but also guide for the soul. Its cycles shape our emotions. Its presence influences our DNA. It was placed not only to defend, but to awaken. Let us ask: does the Moon play a role in our spiritual and genetic evolution, and if so, what is its purpose?”
Question 1 — Ancient myths, from Princess Kaguya to lunar deities, connect the Moon to human origins — could these be memories of ET involvement?
Motoori Norinaga:
“In Shinto, magokoro is the true heart, uncorrupted. Myths like Kaguya-hime are not idle tales, but encoded truths. They preserve memory across centuries. Perhaps the Moon was not only symbol, but presence — a home for beings who walked among us, remembered as kami.”
Princess Kaguya:
“Yes. I was never only a story. I came from another world, hidden in bamboo light. The Moon was my exile, my return. Humans remembered me as myth because truth was unbearable. My presence was proof: the Moon and Earth are kin.”
Carl Sagan:
“Myth often cloaks memory. If humanity recalls beings from the Moon or stars, it may be projection, or it may be fragments of contact. Either way, myths are valuable — they keep alive the intuition that we are part of a larger cosmos. ET or archetype, they remind us we are not alone.”
Yuval Noah Harari:
“Myths unify societies. Whether Kaguya was alien or imagination, the story trained Japanese culture to see the Moon as origin, as destiny. If these myths were seeded by ETs, then they shaped history deliberately. Myths are technology of memory.”
Bashar:
“Yes, these are memories. Humanity has contact encoded in myth. The Moon was involved in seeding your civilization, guiding cycles of consciousness. Kaguya is not only archetype, but history translated into poetry. You remember us through stories.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: myths are veils. They said, ‘We give you stories, so the truth will survive when facts are denied.’ Kaguya is not fantasy. She is message: the Moon has always been part of humanity’s story.”
Question 2 — Does the Moon influence human DNA or consciousness through cycles, light, or hidden technologies?
Bashar:
“Yes. The Moon acts as amplifier. Its cycles entrain your biology — tides of blood, rhythms of fertility, states of mind. Beyond that, hidden technologies inside the Moon emit frequencies that stabilize DNA. It is a tuning fork for evolution.”
Carl Sagan:
“Biologically, the Moon’s cycles shape reproduction, circadian rhythms, migration of animals. To say it influences DNA directly is speculative. But to deny its influence is folly. The Moon has written itself into life on Earth. Whether natural or guided, it is undeniable.”
Motoori Norinaga:
“The ancients saw the Moon’s light as pure, reflective of the sun but gentler. This light, they believed, nurtured sincerity, magokoro. If light itself influences the spirit, then perhaps what we call consciousness is tuned by the Moon’s glow.”
Princess Kaguya:
“I can tell you: the Moon sings. You may not hear, but your cells do. Its song aligns your growth. Without it, your bodies would falter. Its glow carries memory, and its rhythm teaches balance. My exile was not to leave you — it was to watch over you.”
Yuval Noah Harari:
“If the Moon shapes DNA, then it has shaped history. Reproduction, agriculture, ritual calendars — all depend on lunar cycles. Consciousness is not separate from timekeeping. The Moon gave humanity time, and time gave humanity culture.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: DNA is not static. It is awakened by vibration. They said, ‘The Moon hums, and your cells remember.’ Its cycles are not only for crops, but for soul. Consciousness is tuned, gently, by lunar song.”
Question 3 — If the Moon is guiding humanity’s evolution, what is the ultimate goal — survival, awakening, or cosmic belonging?
Carl Sagan:
“Survival is the minimum. Awakening is possible. Cosmic belonging is the dream. If the Moon has been guide, then its goal is to awaken in us awe — to make us reach for the stars. That is enough.”
Yuval Noah Harari:
“The Moon shaped humanity by giving us myth, calendar, rhythm. Its goal is not survival alone — many species survive. Its goal is culture, identity, story. With the Moon, humans became narrators of their own destiny.”
Bashar:
“The goal is belonging. Survival is ensured, awakening is encouraged, but the destination is cosmic kinship. The Moon prepares you to join the galactic family. Its cycles are initiations. Each phase brings you closer to remembering who you are.”
Motoori Norinaga:
“In magokoro, the true heart, we find the goal. Not survival alone, but sincerity. The Moon teaches constancy — always present, always returning. Its lesson is purity of heart. That is awakening, and awakening is belonging.”
Princess Kaguya:
“My role was to remind you: you are not alone. The Moon is cradle, teacher, and bridge. The goal is not exile, but reunion. When you awaken, you will join us beyond the veil. That is the promise.”
Shinmyo Koshin:
“The guardians told me: the Moon will guide until humanity remembers magokoro. The goal is not only life, but true heart. With sincerity, you will survive, awaken, and belong. Without sincerity, you will survive in body, but not in soul. The Moon awaits your choice.”
Closing by Shinmyo Koshin
“The Moon is not only guardian of Earth, but guardian of our becoming. Its cycles whisper to our DNA, its light shapes our spirit. When magokoro, true heart, awakens in humanity, the Moon’s role will be revealed: not as mystery above us, but as guide within us — a bridge to our cosmic belonging.”
Final Thoughts by Shinmyo Koshin
The Moon does not only orbit above us. It orbits within us — in our stories, our blood, our dreams. Scientists measure its gravity, mystics feel its cycles, and guardians remind us it is not accident but gift.
The guardians told me: ‘When humanity lives with true heart, the doors will open.’ Perhaps the far side will reveal its towers. Perhaps the hollow will reveal its gardens. Perhaps Princess Kaguya will no longer be only myth, but memory.
Yet the deeper truth is simple: the Moon teaches patience, sincerity, and belonging. If we honor the Earth, the Moon will continue to shield us. If we awaken our magokoro, the Moon will no longer be distant. It will be bridge — from Earth to cosmos, from story to truth, from humanity to eternity.
Short Bios:
Shinmyo Koshin
A foremost Japanese psychic and spiritual teacher, recognized for his detailed insights into cosmic phenomena, consciousness, and humanity’s future. In his widely followed talks, he discusses the hidden role of the Moon, the guardianship of unseen beings, and the importance of magokoro (true heart) as humanity’s key to survival and awakening.
Princess Kaguya
A legendary figure from The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, Japan’s oldest folktale. Interpreted here as an extraterrestrial refugee, her myth symbolizes humanity’s link to the Moon and the cosmos.
Carl Jung (1875–1961)
Swiss psychiatrist and founder of analytical psychology. He studied archetypes, symbols, and collective memory, making him central to discussions about myth and cosmic meaning.
Carl Sagan (1934–1996)
American astronomer, planetary scientist, and science communicator. Author of Cosmos, he inspired millions to view humanity as part of the wider universe.
James Lovelock (1919–2022)
British scientist and futurist, best known for the Gaia Hypothesis, which views Earth as a self-regulating organism.
Yuval Noah Harari (1976– )
Israeli historian and author of Sapiens, Homo Deus, and 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. He examines myth, technology, and human destiny.
Motoori Norinaga (1730–1801)
Edo-period Japanese scholar of literature and Shinto thought. He emphasized magokoro as the pure heart and interpreted Japan’s ancient myths.
Dōgen Zenji (1200–1253)
Founder of the Sōtō Zen school in Japan. His teachings on nature, time, and practice continue to shape Japanese spirituality.
Masahiro Mori (1927–2018)
Japanese roboticist, known for coining “the uncanny valley.” He also explored the spiritual dimension of technology and Buddhism.
Edgar Mitchell (1930–2016)
Apollo 14 astronaut and sixth man to walk on the Moon. Later became outspoken about UFOs, ET life, and consciousness studies.
Dr. Christopher C. Kraft Jr. (1924–2019)
NASA’s first flight director, key architect of the Apollo missions. A voice for technical rigor and caution.
James Oberg (1944– )
American space journalist, historian, and former NASA engineer. Known for analyzing anomalies and UFO claims with a critical eye.
Linda Moulton Howe (1942– )
American investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker, focused on UFO phenomena, government secrecy, and extraterrestrial presence.
Ingo Swann (1933–2013)
American psychic and remote viewer, known for his alleged visions of structures on the Moon and Mars.
Council of Nine
A channeled extraterrestrial collective, often described as guardians and overseers of humanity’s evolution.
Ashtar
A channeled ET commander figure, often associated with cosmic fleets and messages of planetary protection.
Bashar
A channeled ET consciousness, voiced by Darryl Anka, teaching about parallel realities, vibration, and humanity’s awakening.
Elohim
An ET or higher-dimensional collective often referenced in mystical and channeled traditions, presented here as guardians of Earth.
Leave a Reply