Rethinking Prisons: From Punishment to Productivity for All

Nick Shirley:  

Hey everyone, I’m Nick Shirley, and after spending time inside El Salvador’s unconventional prison system, I’ve seen firsthand that incarceration doesn’t have to mean wasted lives. Around the world, prisons are often crime factories, where inmates leave more dangerous than when they entered. But what if prisons were built for rehabilitation, education, and reintegration instead of just punishment?

Today, we’re diving into a new vision for global prison reform—one where inmates don’t just serve time, but learn skills, work, and contribute to society. I’ve gathered some of the world’s top experts in government, criminal justice, business, and education to discuss how prisons can become centers for transformation instead of lifelong punishment.

Over five discussions, we’ll tackle prison labor, education, second chances, and policy reform—all with one goal: rethinking incarceration so that it benefits everyone—prisoners, taxpayers, and society as a whole. No one should be left behind.

Now, let’s get into it—can we turn prisons from maximum security into maximum productivity? Let’s find out.

(Note: This is an imaginary conversation, a creative exploration of an idea, and not a real speech or event.)

Transforming Prisons into Rehabilitation Centers – A Global Model for Change

Nick Shirley:
Hey everyone, I’m Nick Shirley, and after spending time inside El Salvador’s prisons to document the incredible transformation under Plan Cero Ocio, I have to say—this might be the most revolutionary prison system in the world right now. Instead of just locking people away, inmates are working, studying, and actually helping to rebuild their own country.

But the big question is—can this model work globally? To help answer that, we’ve got an amazing panel today. First, we have President Nayib Bukele, who pioneered this system in El Salvador. Next, we have John Legend, a strong advocate for criminal justice reform. Joining us as well is Dr. Rafael Yuste, a neuroscientist who studies brain plasticity and rehabilitation. And finally, we have Ziauddin Yousafzai, a passionate education advocate.

Let’s start with you, President Bukele. What inspired you to completely rethink the prison system in El Salvador?

Nayib Bukele:
Thanks, Nick. For years, El Salvador was one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Gangs controlled not only the streets but also the prisons. We realized that simply locking people up wasn’t solving the problem—prisons had become crime hubs. We needed a system where inmates contributed positively, both to themselves and to society. That’s why we implemented Plan Cero Ocio—every inmate works or studies. No one sits idle.

Nick Shirley:
And the results have been staggering. Crime rates have dropped dramatically, and El Salvador is now one of the safest countries in the Western Hemisphere. But let’s talk about the human side of this—John, from your advocacy work, what do you think is the key to making rehabilitation the focus of prison systems?

John Legend:
It comes down to opportunity. In the U.S. and many other countries, people leave prison worse off than when they entered. No education, no job skills, and worst of all, a criminal record that follows them for life. If we treated prison as a place to rebuild rather than just punish, we’d see real change. What El Salvador has done is prove that when inmates are given structure and responsibility, they rise to the occasion.

But there’s still skepticism. People worry that prison should be tough—some even believe it should be suffering. How do we change that mindset?

Nayib Bukele:
It’s about showing results. When people see that former inmates are coming out of prison as engineers, carpenters, and farmers instead of gang leaders, they start to believe in the process. We’re not being "soft" on crime—we’re being smart on crime.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a great point. Now, let’s shift gears to the science behind rehabilitation. Dr. Yuste, from a neuroscience perspective, what happens in the brain when people are given the opportunity to learn and develop skills, even after committing crimes?

Rafael Yuste:
Neuroscience tells us that human brains are plastic, meaning they can change and adapt. When someone is involved in structured learning—whether it’s education or vocational training—they’re literally rewiring their brain. If you take someone who has spent years in a violent environment and put them into a program where they’re problem-solving, working, and learning every day, their brain starts to function differently.

So, when a system like Plan Cero Ocio forces inmates to work and learn 24/7, they are building new neural pathways that help them reintegrate into society. This is why rehabilitation isn’t just a moral argument—it’s a scientific one.

Nick Shirley:
That’s fascinating. Now, Ziauddin, I want to bring you in here. You’ve been a strong advocate for education as a tool for breaking cycles of violence and poverty. What role do you think education plays in preventing people from ending up in prison in the first place?

Ziauddin Yousafzai:
Education is the most powerful tool for breaking cycles of violence. Many young people who turn to crime do so because they lacked opportunities early in life. If schools fail them, the streets become their education system.

What we need to do is take the Plan Cero Ocio model and apply it before people ever commit crimes. Stronger education systems, vocational training for at-risk youth, and mentorship programs can prevent many people from ever entering the prison system. But for those who do, prisons must function as schools, not warehouses for punishment.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a great way to frame it—prevention through education. But let’s be real here. Some countries will say, “This sounds great, but it’s too expensive.” President Bukele, how do you respond to that?

Nayib Bukele:
The real cost is not rehabilitating people. It’s keeping people in a cycle of crime. Before our reforms, El Salvador was spending billions on law enforcement, emergency response, and prison management, only to see crime rates stay the same. Now, we have safer streets, productive prisons, and a labor force that contributes instead of drains resources.

The world has to decide—do you want to keep throwing money at broken systems, or do you want to invest in real solutions?

Nick Shirley:
That’s a powerful statement. As we wrap up, I want each of you to give one action step that governments around the world can take today to start shifting toward this model.

John Legend:
Fund prison education programs. Every prison should offer literacy, job training, and business skills as part of rehabilitation.

Rafael Yuste:
Integrate neuroscience into prison reform. When we understand how brains change, we can design better rehabilitation programs.

Ziauddin Yousafzai:
Make sure prisons function like schools. Every inmate should leave prison with more knowledge and skills than when they entered.

Nayib Bukele:
Stop seeing prisons as a dumping ground for criminals. Instead, treat them as rehabilitation centers that produce workers, not repeat offenders.

Nick Shirley:
That’s it, folks! This isn’t just a conversation—it’s a challenge to the world. If El Salvador can do it, why can’t other countries? The choice is simple—do we want our prisons to be crime factories or transformation centers?

Let’s keep this discussion going. If you’re watching this, share your thoughts. Can this model work in your country? Let’s make change happen.

The Economics of Prison Labor – Benefiting Society Without Exploitation

Moderator: Nick Shirley
Speakers: Nayib Bukele, Sheryl Sandberg, Scott Budnick, Muhammad Yunus

Nick Shirley:
Hey everyone, I’m Nick Shirley, and after documenting the transformation of El Salvador’s prison system under Plan Cero Ocio, one of the biggest takeaways was how prison labor can be structured in a way that benefits both society and inmates—without being exploitative.

In many parts of the world, prison labor is seen as a cheap labor force, sometimes bordering on modern-day slavery. But El Salvador has taken a different approach, where prisoners are learning real skills, being productive, and even reducing their sentences through their work.

So, the big question today is: How do we design ethical, productive prison labor programs that serve both inmates and the economy? To help answer that, we’ve got a powerhouse panel. We have President Nayib Bukele, who spearheaded the reforms in El Salvador. We also have Sheryl Sandberg, a business leader who understands how workforce development can drive change. Scott Budnick, a major advocate for prison reform and founder of the Anti-Recidivism Coalition. And finally, Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel Prize-winning economist who pioneered microfinance and social business.

Let’s start with you, President Bukele. How does prison labor in El Salvador differ from the exploitative models we see elsewhere?

Nayib Bukele:
Thanks, Nick. The key difference is purpose. Many prison labor programs around the world exist purely for profit—companies use inmates for low-wage or even unpaid labor, with no plan for their future. That’s exploitation.

In El Salvador, every prisoner works, but their labor is tied directly to rehabilitation and reintegration. They’re learning construction, mechanics, textiles, agriculture—skills they can use when they’re released. More importantly, they’re contributing to society by producing uniforms for students, building infrastructure, and growing food. They’re not just working to survive; they’re working to rebuild the country.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a great distinction. Now, Sheryl, from a corporate perspective, why do so few companies actively hire rehabilitated inmates? And how can businesses be part of the solution?

Sheryl Sandberg:
There’s still a huge stigma against hiring former inmates, which is a missed opportunity. Many companies are desperate for skilled workers, yet they overlook an entire labor pool that could fill those gaps.

One solution is apprenticeship programs in prisons, where companies collaborate with prison labor programs to train inmates for real jobs. If an inmate has already spent years learning a trade inside, businesses should see them as a trained, job-ready candidate upon release.

Companies also need incentives. Governments should offer tax benefits or subsidies to businesses that hire former inmates. If hiring rehabilitated prisoners became a win-win for both businesses and society, we’d see more companies stepping up.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a great point. Now, Scott, you’ve worked extensively with prison reform programs in the U.S. What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way prison labor is currently structured?

Scott Budnick:
The biggest flaw? Lack of transparency and lack of purpose.

Many prison labor programs operate behind closed doors, where inmates work for cents on the dollar in industries that don’t help them build a future. In some cases, they work for companies that wouldn’t even hire them after release. That’s insane.

We need clear standards for fair wages and ethical treatment. More importantly, we need direct pipelines from prison labor to employment. Every prison job should have a real-world equivalent, where an inmate who works in mechanics inside can step into a job on the outside. That’s how you reduce recidivism.

I’d also love to see prison cooperatives, where inmates own a share of the businesses they help build. Imagine if they left prison not just with job skills, but with actual capital to start fresh.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a powerful idea—turning inmates into business owners instead of just workers. Muhammad, you’ve spent your career promoting social business and financial empowerment. How could a microfinance or social business model work inside prisons?

Muhammad Yunus:
Prisons should not just produce workers—they should produce entrepreneurs.

Many people who end up in prison already have an entrepreneurial mindset—they just used it in the wrong way. Instead of selling drugs, they could have been running a legitimate business if they had the right support system.

What if prisons had startup incubators, where inmates learned business planning, financial literacy, and investment strategies? Upon release, they could receive small loans to start their own businesses. This would reduce unemployment, cut crime, and empower former inmates to contribute to the economy.

We could also introduce prison cooperatives, where inmates work in industries like farming or textiles and own shares of the business. When they’re released, they leave with money, experience, and a business network.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a revolutionary idea. Now, let’s be real—many governments and corporations profit from cheap prison labor. How do we push for change when there’s resistance from those who benefit from the current system?

Sheryl Sandberg:
Public pressure. People don’t want to support unethical labor, but most don’t even know it’s happening. If consumers demand transparency, corporations will be forced to change. Imagine if every product had a label saying whether it was made using fair prison labor, just like Fair Trade coffee.

Governments also need to step up. If El Salvador can make prison labor rehabilitative, why can’t other countries? Policies should require fair wages, skill-building, and employer partnerships for prison labor programs.

Scott Budnick:
And we need media exposure. Nick, your documentary showed the world what’s possible. If more filmmakers, journalists, and influencers exposed the failures of traditional prison labor, public opinion would shift fast.

Nick Shirley:
That’s why we’re having this conversation! Let’s wrap up with one action step each of you would recommend to governments, businesses, or society to make prison labor ethical and effective.

Nayib Bukele:
Governments must ensure that prison labor programs train inmates for real-world jobs—not just keep them busy. Every prison job should lead to employment opportunities outside.

Sheryl Sandberg:
Corporations must commit to hiring rehabilitated inmates. If every major company pledged to hire just 5% of their workforce from prison rehabilitation programs, we’d see massive change.

Scott Budnick:
Governments should mandate transparency in prison labor programs. If companies or prisons are profiting unfairly from inmate work, the public deserves to know.

Muhammad Yunus:
Introduce microfinance and cooperative business models into prisons. Give inmates a chance to leave with money and a business plan, not just a criminal record.

Nick Shirley:
Amazing insights today. If prison labor is done right, it can be a tool for rehabilitation, economic growth, and social good—not just a source of cheap labor. But it takes policy changes, corporate responsibility, and public awareness to make it happen.

Now, for those watching or reading—what do you think? Should your country adopt ethical prison labor programs like in El Salvador? Let’s keep this conversation going!

Prison Education & Vocational Training – From Inmate to Entrepreneur

Moderator: Nick Shirley
Speakers: Nayib Bukele, Michael Santos, Esther Duflo, Dame Vivian Hunt

Nick Shirley:
Hey everyone, I’m Nick Shirley, and after documenting El Salvador’s prison transformation, one of the most powerful takeaways was how education and vocational training inside prisons can turn inmates into productive members of society.

Right now, in most prisons around the world, inmates serve time but don’t gain any real skills—so when they’re released, they struggle to find jobs, fall back into crime, and end up back behind bars. That cycle costs taxpayers billions and keeps communities unsafe.

But what if prisons were centers for education and entrepreneurship? That’s exactly what we’re discussing today. We have President Nayib Bukele, who redefined prison rehabilitation in El Salvador. Michael Santos, who went from being incarcerated to becoming an entrepreneur and criminal justice reform advocate. Esther Duflo, an economist who studies poverty, education, and crime. And Dame Vivian Hunt, a business leader who champions workforce development.

President Bukele, I want to start with you. In El Salvador, inmates must work or study under Plan Cero Ocio. Why did you make education a requirement in prison?

Nayib Bukele:
Because idle prisons breed crime. Before our reforms, inmates were sitting around, with nothing to do, making gang connections, and planning crimes. Now, every prisoner is either working, learning, or both.

We created vocational training centers inside prisons for construction, mechanics, textiles, and agriculture. But we also introduced higher education, so inmates can earn degrees in business administration and other fields. This means that when they leave, they have real skills and can contribute to society instead of falling back into crime.

And here’s the proof—it’s working. Former inmates are now employed in government projects, farming, and private companies. Some even started businesses of their own.

Nick Shirley:
That’s incredible. Michael, you lived this firsthand. You were sentenced to 45 years in prison, yet you left with an education and a business career. How did you do it, and what lessons can be applied to prisons globally?

Michael Santos:
When I was sentenced, I realized that if I wanted a future, I had to educate myself. I read hundreds of books, earned degrees, and built a network of people willing to help me after I got out.

The biggest lesson? Prison should prepare you for success, not failure.

Here’s the reality: If an inmate spends years in prison without learning a skill, what do we expect them to do when they get out? They go back to what they know—crime.

That’s why I advocate for self-directed learning inside prisons. Give inmates access to books, online courses, and structured education programs so they can build their future while serving their time.

Nick Shirley:
That makes sense. But let’s talk about the economic side of this. Esther, from your research, how does prison education impact national economies?

Esther Duflo:
The evidence is clear—investing in prison education saves money. Every dollar spent on inmate education reduces future crime costs by five dollars. Why? Because educated inmates are less likely to reoffend, which means fewer people in prison, less strain on law enforcement, and a stronger workforce.

Countries that focus on rehabilitation over punishment see lower crime rates and higher economic productivity. The problem is that governments often focus on short-term costs instead of long-term savings.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a great point. Vivian, from a business perspective, how can companies help with prison education and job placement?

Dame Vivian Hunt:
Companies are desperate for skilled workers, yet they ignore a massive untapped labor pool—former inmates.

Here’s what businesses can do:

1. Create training programs inside prisons. If businesses invest in vocational education while inmates are serving time, they’ll have job-ready employees when they get out.
2. Hire rehabilitated inmates. If every major company committed to hiring just 5% of their workforce from rehabilitated prisoners, it would dramatically reduce unemployment and crime.
3. Mentorship and internships. Pair inmates with professionals in business, technology, and trades so they have a clear path forward when they re-enter society.

This isn’t charity—it’s smart business. When companies support rehabilitation, they get loyal, hardworking employees and help solve one of society’s biggest problems.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a win-win. But let’s be honest—not all countries are on board with this yet. President Bukele, what would you say to leaders in other nations who hesitate to invest in prison education?

Nayib Bukele:
I’d ask them: Do you want your prisons to be schools or crime factories?

Because those are the only two options. If you don’t educate or train inmates, they will learn from each other—and it won’t be good things.

Prison education isn’t soft on crime. It’s smart on crime. And the results in El Salvador prove it.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a powerful statement. Let’s wrap up with a quick action step from each of you—what’s the one thing every country should do today to turn prisons into rehabilitation centers?

Michael Santos:
Give inmates access to books, online courses, and job training from day one of their sentence.

Esther Duflo:
Make prison education a national priority—it saves money and reduces crime in the long run.

Dame Vivian Hunt:
Businesses must commit to hiring rehabilitated inmates and investing in prison workforce training programs.

Nayib Bukele:
Governments must make prison labor meaningful—every inmate should leave prison with a skill and a job opportunity.

Nick Shirley:
That’s it, folks. The message is clear—prisons should build people up, not break them down. If we can turn incarceration into education and opportunity, we can reduce crime, strengthen economies, and change lives.

Now, for everyone watching or reading—do you think your country should adopt a prison education model like El Salvador’s? Let us know in the comments.

Breaking the Cycle of Crime – Reintegration and Second Chances

Moderator: Nick Shirley
Speakers: Nayib Bukele, Father Greg Boyle, Deanna Van Buren, Bryan Stevenson

Nick Shirley:
Hey everyone, I’m Nick Shirley, and after seeing firsthand how El Salvador’s prison system is changing lives through rehabilitation, one of the biggest questions is: What happens after inmates are released?

For many former prisoners, the struggle doesn’t end when they walk out of prison. Stigma, unemployment, and lack of support push many right back into crime. But what if societies invested in second chances instead of lifelong punishment?

Today, we have an amazing panel to discuss how we can break the cycle of crime and ensure former inmates successfully reintegrate. We have President Nayib Bukele, who has implemented groundbreaking prison reforms in El Salvador. Father Greg Boyle, founder of Homeboy Industries, the world’s largest gang rehabilitation program. Deanna Van Buren, an architect and activist designing spaces for restorative justice. And Bryan Stevenson, a legal expert and author of Just Mercy, who has dedicated his career to fighting for criminal justice reform.

President Bukele, let’s start with you. What happens to inmates after they leave El Salvador’s prisons?

Nayib Bukele:
That’s a crucial question, Nick, because rehabilitation doesn’t stop at the prison gates. If a prisoner works hard, learns skills, and then walks into a society that won’t hire them, they’ll fall right back into crime.

That’s why in El Salvador, we’ve partnered with businesses and government projects to ensure former inmates can find work immediately. Many are employed in construction, agriculture, and mechanics, using the skills they learned inside. Some have even started their own businesses.

The key is structure—former inmates need jobs, mentorship, and community support, or they’ll struggle to reintegrate.

Nick Shirley:
That’s huge. Father Greg, you’ve spent decades helping former gang members rebuild their lives through Homeboy Industries. What’s the biggest barrier ex-prisoners face when trying to reintegrate?

Father Greg Boyle:
The biggest barrier? Shame and rejection.

Society tells them: You messed up, and you don’t belong here anymore. That kind of rejection is toxic—it makes people feel hopeless, and when you have no hope, you go back to what you know.

At Homeboy Industries, we create a sense of belonging first. We offer jobs, therapy, education, and community support. But the most important thing we give them is love and respect—a chance to believe they are more than their worst mistake.

People don’t change because they’re punished—they change because they’re supported.

Nick Shirley:
That’s powerful. Deanna, I want to bring you in here. You’re changing the physical spaces where justice happens. How does design play a role in breaking the cycle of crime?

Deanna Van Buren:
Traditional prisons and courts are built on punishment and isolation—cold walls, metal bars, harsh lighting. These spaces tell people: You are nothing but a criminal.

But imagine if prisons were designed like schools or training centers. Imagine if courthouses looked like places for healing and resolution, instead of punishment.

I’ve designed restorative justice centers, where victims and offenders can meet, talk, and work toward healing instead of just punishment. If we change the spaces where justice happens, we change how people experience justice.

And post-incarceration? Former inmates need safe, welcoming spaces to work, learn, and reconnect with society—not just get dumped on the street with nowhere to go.

Nick Shirley:
That makes total sense. Bryan, you’ve worked with thousands of people trying to rebuild their lives after prison. What do you think needs to change on a legal and policy level?

Bryan Stevenson:
First, we need to end permanent punishment. Too many ex-prisoners are blocked from housing, employment, and voting—so we expect them to rejoin society, but we don’t actually let them.

We need:

• Ban-the-box policies, so job applications don’t automatically disqualify former inmates.
• Government-supported reentry programs, offering housing, mentorship, and job placement.
• More funding for restorative justice, so people can rebuild relationships instead of just being thrown back into the system.

When people are given a second chance, they take it. But right now, society isn’t offering that chance to enough people.

Nick Shirley:
That’s an important point. President Bukele, do you think other countries can replicate what El Salvador has done in terms of job placement and reintegration?

Nayib Bukele:
Absolutely. But it takes political will. Many governments fear public backlash—people think prison should be about punishment, not opportunity.

But here’s what I tell them: Would you rather invest in jobs or in more crime? Because if we don’t reintegrate former inmates, crime rates will go up. It’s that simple.

Any country that’s serious about safety needs to focus on reintegration, not just incarceration.

Nick Shirley:
I love that. Now, let’s talk about real solutions. If every country could implement one key policy tomorrow to help former inmates reintegrate successfully, what should it be?

Father Greg Boyle:
End the stigma. Society needs to treat former inmates like human beings, not criminals for life.

Deanna Van Buren:
Design justice spaces for healing, not just punishment. From prisons to reentry centers, space matters.

Bryan Stevenson:
Change the laws. Give former inmates access to jobs, housing, and education, so they don’t stay trapped in poverty.

Nayib Bukele:
Create structured reentry programs. Every inmate should have a job lined up before they leave prison.

Nick Shirley:
That’s it, folks—prison reform doesn’t stop at release. If we want safer societies, we need to make sure former inmates have a future.

Now, for those reading or watching—do you think your country is doing enough to help former inmates reintegrate? If not, what should change? Let’s talk about it.

From Maximum Security to Maximum Productivity – Rethinking Global Prison Policies

Moderator: Nick Shirley
Speakers: Nayib Bukele, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Martha Minow, Richard Branson, General John F. Kelly

Nick Shirley:
Hey everyone, I’m Nick Shirley. After spending time inside El Salvador’s prisons, one thing became crystal clear—prisons don’t have to be crime factories.

With the right policies, they can become rehabilitation centers, workforce training hubs, and even economic drivers. But most of the world still treats prisons as warehouses for criminals, with little regard for what happens inside—or what happens when inmates are released.

So today, we’re talking about how to rethink global prison policies, turning maximum security into maximum productivity. We’ve got an amazing panel:

• President Nayib Bukele, who pioneered El Salvador’s prison reform.
• Ruth Wilson Gilmore, a leading expert on mass incarceration and prison abolition.
• Martha Minow, a legal scholar specializing in alternative justice systems.
• Richard Branson, an entrepreneur and advocate for second chances.
• General John F. Kelly, a military leader who understands discipline, structure, and leadership development.

President Bukele, let’s start with you. How did El Salvador go from one of the most dangerous prison systems in the world to one of the most structured and productive?

Nayib Bukele:
It started with one simple realization—our prisons were part of the crime problem, not the solution.

Before our reforms, gang leaders controlled the prisons. They were running criminal operations from behind bars, sending orders to the streets, and strengthening their networks.

So we took back control. We separated gang leaders, cut off communication, and implemented 24/7 work and education programs for inmates. Now, every prisoner is working, learning, or both—they don’t just sit in cells all day.

The result? Crime has dropped, recidivism is down, and prisons are actually contributing to the economy instead of draining it.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a massive shift. Ruth, you’ve studied mass incarceration around the world. What’s the biggest problem with how most countries handle prisons today?

Ruth Wilson Gilmore:
The biggest problem? Prisons are built to punish, not to solve problems.

Most prison systems are reactive, not proactive. They lock people up after they commit crimes but do almost nothing to prevent crime in the first place.

What we need is a fundamental shift—prisons shouldn’t just be places where people serve time. They should be centers for transformation. The goal should be less crime, not more prisoners.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a great point. Martha, you’ve worked on alternative justice systems—things like restorative justice and diversion programs. How do these approaches compare to traditional prisons?

Martha Minow:
Alternative justice systems focus on repairing harm rather than just locking people away.

For example, instead of sentencing someone to years in prison for a nonviolent crime, we could put them in a structured rehabilitation program, where they learn skills, work, and make amends to society.

This approach works better than incarceration for many crimes—it reduces recidivism, saves money, and keeps communities safer.

But to do this at scale, governments need to shift funding away from mass incarceration and toward rehabilitation.

Nick Shirley:
That’s a big challenge—many governments spend billions on prisons but almost nothing on rehabilitation. Richard, as an entrepreneur, what’s the business case for rethinking prison policies?

Richard Branson:
The business case is simple—prisons waste human potential.

Think about it—how many talented, intelligent people are locked up right now, sitting in a cell, doing nothing? Instead of wasting that potential, we should be training inmates for real-world jobs, entrepreneurship, and leadership.

I’ve seen firsthand that when companies hire rehabilitated inmates, they get loyal, hardworking employees who are grateful for a second chance. If more businesses embraced this, we’d see a huge economic and social impact.

Nick Shirley:
That’s powerful. General Kelly, from a military perspective, how could discipline, structure, and leadership training be used inside prisons to help inmates reform?

General John F. Kelly:
Discipline is key. In the military, structure and accountability turn young recruits into leaders. We should apply the same principles inside prisons.

Imagine if inmates followed a structured daily routine—physical training, education, job training, and leadership development. Instead of letting criminals waste away, we should be building them into disciplined, productive citizens.

I also believe in mentorship programs—former military personnel could work with inmates, teaching them teamwork, responsibility, and problem-solving skills. This isn’t about being “soft”—it’s about turning lost potential into something positive.

Nick Shirley:
That makes a lot of sense. But let’s talk about scaling this globally. If countries want to move away from mass incarceration, what’s the first step?

Nayib Bukele:
Governments must commit to rehabilitation as the goal of incarceration, not just punishment.

Ruth Wilson Gilmore:
We need to invest in alternatives—more job training, more community-based programs, fewer life sentences for nonviolent crimes.

Martha Minow:
Laws must change—people shouldn’t leave prison worse off than when they entered.

Richard Branson:
Businesses need to step up and hire former inmates—if they don’t have jobs, they’ll go back to crime.

General John F. Kelly:
Prisons should function like military training programs—structure, discipline, leadership, and accountability.

Nick Shirley:
That’s it, folks—prisons don’t have to be crime factories. If we reimagine them as centers for productivity and transformation, we don’t just help inmates—we make society safer and stronger.

Now, here’s the question—should your country adopt a model like this? Let us know what you think. Let’s keep the conversation going.

Short Bios: