Charlie Kirk Explores Mental Health and Belief Systems

Charlie Kirk: 

Why are conservatives consistently happier, more stable, and less depressed than liberals?

That’s not my opinion—it’s what the data says. According to surveys from Gallup, Pew, and Nate Silver’s own analysis of the General Social Survey, conservatives report far higher mental well-being than their liberal counterparts.

Why is that? What role does belief play?

In this five-part conversation, we tackle the uncomfortable truth: your worldview isn’t just about who you vote for—it shapes your peace, your purpose, and your emotional stability.

Whether it’s faith, family, gratitude, or responsibility—some frameworks build you up. Others wear you down.

I invited some of the sharpest minds—from both sides—to explore this. I didn’t want a one-sided rant. I wanted a real dialogue.

This isn’t about scoring political points. This is about helping you live better. Let’s begin.

 (Note: This is an imaginary conversation, a creative exploration of an idea, and not a real speech or event.)

Topic 1: Mental Health and Political Identity

Main Question: Why do liberals report worse mental health than conservatives?

Moderator: Charlie Kirk
Panelists:

• Nate Silver – Statistician, founder of FiveThirtyEight

• Dr. Jean Twenge – Psychologist, author of iGen

• Jonathan Haidt – Social psychologist, author of The Righteous Mind

• Allie Beth Stuckey – Conservative commentator, Christian worldview

• Cole – Gen Z progressive activist

🎙️ Opening by Charlie Kirk:

“The numbers are staggering. According to GSS data shared by Nate Silver: 45% of liberals report poor mental health. Only 19% of conservatives say the same. Meanwhile, 51% of conservatives describe their mental health as excellent, compared to just 20% of liberals.

Today, I want to ask: what explains this massive divide? And more importantly—should this shape the way people think about the beliefs they live by?”

❓First Question:

What do you believe is the biggest factor driving the mental health gap between liberals and conservatives?

Dr. Jean Twenge:
There’s no single cause, but one of the clearest trends is the impact of social media, especially on young liberal women. They report the highest rates of anxiety and depression across all groups. Add to that a cultural climate of constant comparison, moral outrage, and political despair—and yes, you get real psychological distress.

Allie Beth Stuckey:
When you remove God, purpose, and traditional family values, you remove the pillars of emotional resilience. Conservative women—my audience—tend to be married, rooted in faith, and purpose-driven. Liberal culture often encourages people to define themselves by pain and identity. That’s a recipe for despair.

Cole:
I think we feel the pain because we actually see the problems. Climate collapse, racism, inequality—it’s exhausting to fight these things. Conservatives may have better mental health because they’re not confronting these injustices as directly. But avoiding pain doesn’t mean it isn’t there.

Nate Silver:
It’s important to separate cause from correlation. Liberals may be more willing to report mental health challenges. That said, even after adjusting for reporting bias, the numbers still show a real gap. The question is: does your worldview make you feel more empowered—or more hopeless?

Jonathan Haidt:
Liberal ideology increasingly teaches people that they are fragile and under threat. That moral lens—centered on harm, oppression, and identity—can heighten anxiety. Conservatives, in contrast, emphasize order, agency, and stability, which are psychologically protective.

❓Second Question:

Do you believe political ideology itself—liberal or conservative—can shape mental health outcomes long-term?

Allie Beth Stuckey:
Absolutely. If your worldview says the world is irredeemably broken, and you’re either a victim or an oppressor—you’ll feel terrible. Conservatism says: you’re responsible, capable, and called to live well. That mindset heals. Liberalism, today, often wounds.

Jonathan Haidt:
Yes, ideologies shape your interpretation of life. When people believe systems are rigged and they’re powerless, their motivation—and their mood—suffer. I’m not saying liberals are wrong to see injustice, but if everything is trauma, then nothing is hopeful.

Cole:
I’d argue the opposite. Being liberal means being awake to pain, and that takes courage. I’m okay feeling heavy if it means I’m living honestly. What we need is more support, not more sermons about “personal responsibility” from people who don’t face what we do.

Nate Silver:
This is where it gets tricky. The data shows conservatives feel better. Whether that’s because of their beliefs or despite them is hard to prove. But clearly, worldview matters. A belief system that gives people a sense of control and belonging leads to better reported well-being.

Dr. Jean Twenge:
One important distinction is identity-based fragility. If your entire self is wrapped in how the world sees your gender, race, or politics—any criticism feels existential. Conservative identity tends to be more externally anchored—church, nation, family. That creates emotional insulation.

❓Third Question:

If you were advising a young person today who feels chronically unhappy, would you tell them to reconsider their political worldview?

Charlie Kirk (moderator):
Before we go into responses, I just want to say—I’m not asking anyone to "change sides." But if your belief system is causing suffering, shouldn’t you at least question it?

Nate Silver:
I’d tell them to first fix their habits: sleep, connection, meaning. But yes, also look at the stories you're telling yourself. If those stories lead to helplessness, you might need a better framework—political or otherwise.

Cole:
I’d say: Don’t stop caring. Don’t trade truth for comfort. But also—don’t do it alone. Find community, therapy, rest. The goal isn’t to be conservative or liberal—it’s to be whole.

Allie Beth Stuckey:
I’d say: You were made for more than just reacting to the news. You were made for love, purpose, family, and faith. Try the values that have worked for thousands of years. You don’t need to be angry to be moral.

Dr. Jean Twenge:
I’d encourage them to detach identity from ideology. Explore who you are outside your political tribe. That freedom alone can lower anxiety.

Jonathan Haidt:
Yes. Try stepping into a worldview that emphasizes strength over fragility, growth over grievance. The shift isn’t betrayal—it’s evolution.

🔚 Closing by Charlie Kirk:

“We’re not here to mock pain—we’re here to ask: What kind of belief system gives you a better shot at joy?

The numbers don’t lie: 45% of liberals report poor mental health. Only 19% of conservatives do. And over half of conservatives say they feel excellent.

Maybe it’s time we asked not just what we believe—but what our beliefs are doing to us.”

Topic 2: Is Liberalism Rooted in Resentment and Envy?

Main Question: Are progressive movements fueled more by grievance than by gratitude?

Moderator: Charlie Kirk
Panelists:

• Ben Shapiro – Conservative commentator

• Cornel West – Progressive philosopher

• Dr. Jordan Peterson – Clinical psychologist and cultural critic

• Zoe – Gen Z socialist college student

• Douglas Murray – British author and cultural critic

🎙️ Opening by Charlie Kirk:

“Here’s a tough but vital question: What happens when politics stops being about vision—and becomes about vengeance?

I’ve argued that liberalism today often runs on resentment—against the wealthy, the religious, the successful, even the traditional. Envy, not gratitude, seems to power much of the progressive movement.

But is that really true—or just a conservative talking point? Let’s dive in.”

❓First Question:

Do you see resentment or envy playing a central role in modern liberal or progressive ideology?

Ben Shapiro:
Absolutely. The progressive Left thrives on envy politics—resenting what others have, demanding redistribution, demonizing success. It’s no longer about lifting others up—it’s about tearing down those who stand out. That’s corrosive, both morally and mentally.

Zoe:
I see it as righteous anger, not resentment. People are fed up with generational inequality, corporate greed, and climate injustice. You call it envy—we call it accountability. We don’t want to tear down success—we want to end rigged systems.

Douglas Murray:
The problem is, the language of activism has become increasingly vengeful. It’s not enough to succeed—you must apologize for your privilege. That’s not justice, it’s emotional blackmail masquerading as progress.

Cornel West:
We need to distinguish envy from moral indignation. What you’re calling resentment is often deep grief for broken systems. Yes, people are angry—but that anger can be sacred if it leads to compassion and structural change. Not all fire is destructive.

Dr. Jordan Peterson:
From a psychological lens, resentment is often the emotional disguise for inadequacy. When someone feels they’ve been denied status or success, they lash out ideologically. The danger is that collective resentment can masquerade as moral virtue, while avoiding personal responsibility.

❓Second Question:

Can a politics rooted in resentment sustain a healthy culture—or does it eventually collapse under its own bitterness?

Dr. Jordan Peterson:
It collapses. Societies built on resentment don’t produce innovators, families, or meaning. They produce bureaucracy, fear, and compliance. A culture obsessed with grievance becomes nihilistic, and then authoritarian. That’s not theoretical—it’s historical.

Zoe:
You’re assuming we’re bitter. What if we’re just done being polite? We’ve tried optimism—and got ignored. Now we demand change. That may be uncomfortable for those in power, but real healing requires disruption.

Ben Shapiro:
Resentment is a slow poison. It never says “thank you”—only “you owe me.” You can’t build anything lasting on that. Liberals need to ask: are you building a better world—or just making sure no one’s happier than you?

Cornel West:
Bitterness without love is dangerous. But truth without discomfort is dishonest. We must hold both together. Yes, some activists lose their way—but let’s not dismiss the heart behind the anger: the longing for dignity.

Douglas Murray:
There is no endgame for resentment politics. Today it’s the rich. Tomorrow it’s the educated. Then the married. The religious. It always needs a villain. You cannot construct a civilization out of permanent outrage.

❓Third Question:

What would you say to a young liberal who feels morally driven—but is consumed by anger, frustration, and comparison?

Charlie Kirk (moderator):
We all know people like this. They care deeply—but they’re exhausted, angry, and mentally drained. What do you say to them?

Cornel West:
I’d say: Keep your fire, but add some water. Let grief deepen your love, not harden your soul. Anger alone won’t sustain you. Let your justice be joyful—or it will devour you.

Ben Shapiro:
Step back and ask: are you trying to solve a problem—or punish someone? Real reform comes from clarity, not rage. Drop the envy. Pick up responsibility. It changes everything.

Zoe:
I’d say: You’re not broken. You’re responding to a broken world. Don’t let them gaslight you into thinking your anger isn’t valid. But yeah—protect your peace, too. You matter, not just the cause.

Douglas Murray:
If you feel trapped in permanent outrage, consider this: What beauty are you missing while looking for someone to blame? At some point, gratitude is rebellion.

Dr. Jordan Peterson:
Transform your resentment into courageous action. Build something. Care for someone. Create order. That’s where healing begins—not in protest, but in personal responsibility and sacrifice.

🔚 Closing by Charlie Kirk:

“You’ve heard it. A politics built on resentment can motivate—but can it fulfill?

If your beliefs fuel constant comparison, outrage, and envy—maybe it’s not just society you need to change. Maybe it’s your ideology. Or at least the emotional engine that powers it.

Ask yourself: Is my cause lifting me—or hollowing me out? That answer matters.”

Topic 3: The Role of Religion in Well-being

Main Question: Does faith lead to greater happiness and mental resilience?

Moderator: Charlie Kirk
Panelists:

• Dennis Prager – Jewish conservative thinker, founder of PragerU

• Rev. William Barber – Progressive Christian and civil rights leader

• Dr. Lisa Miller – Clinical psychologist, author of The Awakened Brain

• Emma – Gen Z deconstructed Christian, now spiritual-but-not-religious

• Andrew Tate – Former atheist turned religious, controversial figure with a raw, provocative voice

🎙️ Opening by Charlie Kirk:

“If you want to be happy, go to church. That’s what the data says.

Regular religious participation correlates with lower rates of depression, greater life satisfaction, stronger marriages, and more stable families.

And yet, more and more Americans—especially young people—are walking away from religion.

Are they walking away from joy itself? Let’s discuss.”

❓First Question:

What role does religion play in mental health, and why do you think it affects conservatives more positively than liberals?

Dennis Prager:
Religion provides a moral structure, a sense of meaning, and a community—all vital for well-being. Secular people, especially on the Left, often try to replace faith with politics, which breeds outrage, not peace. God grounds us. Without Him, people feel lost.

Emma:
For me, religion became a source of shame and anxiety. I still believe in something bigger—but I had to leave the church to feel emotionally safe. I think some people flourish with faith. Others need space to heal from it.

Dr. Lisa Miller:
In clinical terms, spiritual life is protective. My research shows that people with an active spiritual core—whether religious or not—have stronger neural resilience. Conservatives are more likely to have these built-in faith practices. It’s less about politics, more about sacred connection.

Andrew Tate:
You can chase money, women, fame—it’s all empty. I used to mock religion. Then I hit rock bottom. Now I pray every day. Men especially need faith. Without it, you drift. You become soft, depressed, weak. Islam gave me discipline and peace.

Rev. William Barber:
True religion is not just personal—it’s also public. It’s about love, justice, and lifting others. The Right sometimes uses religion to protect comfort. But real faith comforts the afflicted—and afflicts the comfortable. Religion saves souls and transforms society.

❓Second Question:

Can a secular or “spiritual-but-not-religious” life offer the same mental health benefits as organized religion?

Dr. Lisa Miller:
Partially. The science is clear: spirituality helps, but those who engage in communal, disciplined practices—like weekly worship—fare even better. “DIY spirituality” lacks structure and community. It’s fragile.

Dennis Prager:
Let me be blunt: religion without God is narcissism. You end up worshiping your own feelings. A meaningful life isn’t about vibes—it’s about values handed down through time. Secular life can’t compete with that.

Emma:
That sounds harsh. For me, leaving organized religion was the beginning of healing. I found peace in nature, in meditation, in art. It’s not self-worship. It’s reconnecting with something sacred that isn’t wrapped in shame or control.

Andrew Tate:
“Spiritual but not religious” is a cop-out. Weak people use it to avoid rules. Faith isn’t about feeling good—it’s about being strong. You need structure. Discipline. Brotherhood. Otherwise, you’ll drift—and the world will eat you alive.

Rev. William Barber:
God is bigger than institutions. But community matters. We need each other. A solitary faith may soothe—but it can’t sustain. The church, mosque, or temple—done right—isn’t a prison. It’s a hospital for the broken.

❓Third Question:

What would you say to a young person today who’s depressed, anxious, and doesn’t believe in anything anymore?

Charlie Kirk (moderator):
We’re seeing record levels of youth depression. Many of them are faithless, isolated, and angry. If one came to you and asked, “What should I believe?”—what would you say?

Andrew Tate:
Believe that your life is not yours. You were created with purpose. Pick a path with rules. Islam changed my life, but any real faith can. Just stop worshiping TikTok and start worshiping God. That’s the antidote to chaos.

Emma:
I’d say: it’s okay to question everything. You’re not broken. Explore different spiritual paths. Read, meditate, ask questions. But don’t give up on the idea that something greater loves you. Even if you don’t have the words for it yet.

Dennis Prager:
You are not the center of the universe. And that is liberating. Stop searching for “your truth.” Start searching for the truth. Faith gives meaning, even when life hurts. Without God, you are alone in a cold universe.

Dr. Lisa Miller:
Start by reconnecting with awe. Go outside. Sit in silence. Speak to something bigger, even if you don’t know what it is. Your soul already knows the way—you just need to listen.

Rev. William Barber:
Believe in love. Believe that your life matters. Then join a community that walks in that truth. Faith isn’t about escaping pain—it’s about transforming it. God’s love doesn’t always explain—but it always redeems.

🔚 Closing by Charlie Kirk:

“In the search for happiness, one path stands out: faith.

Religion offers structure, meaning, discipline, and connection. The numbers confirm it. The testimonies confirm it. And history confirms it.

If your soul is tired, ask yourself—not just what you believe—but what’s been missing. It might be God. It might be tradition. And it just might be your way back to peace.”

Topic 4: Family, Marriage, and Mental Stability

Main Question: Are traditional family structures key to long-term happiness and well-being?

Moderator: Charlie Kirk
Panelists:

• J.D. Vance – U.S. Senator, author of Hillbilly Elegy, traditional family advocate

• AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) – Progressive congresswoman, proponent of diverse family models

• Brad Wilcox – Sociologist, Director of the National Marriage Project

• Noah – Gen Z polyamory advocate, supports non-traditional relationship frameworks

• Heather Mac Donald – Conservative cultural critic, outspoken defender of family norms

🎙️ Opening by Charlie Kirk:

“We’re told today that family doesn’t matter—that marriage is outdated, and that personal freedom should come before commitment. But the data says otherwise.

Married people report higher happiness. Children raised in two-parent homes have better outcomes. And those with strong family ties are less likely to suffer from mental illness.

So what gives? Is tradition actually the key to mental stability? Let’s explore.”

❓First Question:

Do you believe the decline of marriage and traditional family structures has contributed to the rise in mental health problems today?

Heather Mac Donald:
Without question. When you dismantle the family, you create emotional chaos. Children need stability. Adults need commitment. But modern culture says freedom is more important than responsibility. And we are reaping the consequences in loneliness, depression, and social dysfunction.

Noah:
That assumes one model works for everyone. Some people thrive in open relationships, chosen families, or co-parenting setups. What causes harm isn’t the structure, but the lack of communication, care, and consent. Mental health declines when we’re judged—not when we’re free.

J.D. Vance:
I grew up in chaos. No dad. A mom battling addiction. The only thing that saved me was the structure my grandparents provided. We can’t pretend that family doesn’t matter. It’s the foundation of civil society—and personal peace.

AOC:
Let’s be clear: the problem isn’t people choosing non-traditional families—it’s the economic pressure and lack of support that makes it harder to build any kind of family. Blaming freedom ignores the systemic inequality that’s pulling families apart.

Brad Wilcox:
From a sociological standpoint, married, two-parent homes remain the most reliable predictor of emotional and economic stability. That doesn’t mean others can’t thrive—but on average, the traditional model still outperforms the rest.

❓Second Question:

Can non-traditional relationships and modern family models offer the same emotional resilience as the traditional nuclear family?

Brad Wilcox:
It’s possible in individual cases, but much harder at scale. Data shows that cohabiting couples break up more often, and children raised outside of marriage face more risks. Marriage isn’t just a lifestyle—it’s a commitment system that buffers stress.

Noah:
But those stats reflect a society that stigmatizes alternative paths. What if we actually built systems to support single parents, blended families, and polycules? What if love wasn’t measured by a legal contract but by emotional presence and care?

Heather Mac Donald:
That’s poetic—but untrue. Human nature hasn’t changed. Kids crave consistency. Adults crave rootedness. Traditional marriage is the best structure we’ve found to support that. It’s not perfect—but it’s proven.

AOC:
You want to preserve marriage? Then make housing affordable, healthcare universal, and childcare accessible. People aren’t avoiding family because of values—they’re exhausted. Start with justice, and the family will follow.

J.D. Vance:
We need both. Yes, material support helps. But culture matters, too. A society that mocks marriage, undermines fatherhood, and celebrates self over sacrifice cannot build strong families—no matter how many subsidies you throw at it.

❓Third Question:

If a young person today wants a fulfilling life, should they prioritize marriage and family—or focus on freedom and identity first?

Charlie Kirk (moderator):
We’re seeing more young people delay marriage, avoid children, and say “family just isn’t for me.” What advice would you give them?

AOC:
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Some people need time to discover who they are before forming deep commitments. Let’s stop shaming people for choosing a different timeline.

Heather Mac Donald:
That delay often becomes permanent drift. And then the loneliness kicks in. If you want fulfillment—don’t wait. Build family. Commit. The freedom you seek often comes after responsibility, not before.

Noah:
Find your truth. Build your own family—blood or chosen. Just make sure it's rooted in love, not pressure. Freedom isn’t the enemy of stability—it can be its foundation, if built right.

J.D. Vance:
You want meaning? You’ll find it in sacrifice, not self-expression. The happiest people I know aren’t chasing themselves—they’re raising their kids, loving their spouse, showing up every day. It’s not glamorous—but it’s good.

Brad Wilcox:
The data is clear: those who marry, stay married, and raise children tend to live longer, happier, and more stable lives. You can redefine family all you want, but you can’t escape this truth: commitment heals.

🔚 Closing by Charlie Kirk:

“Family isn’t a fad. It’s a foundation.

Whether it’s faith, tradition, or just plain love—marriage and family offer stability that no substitute has matched.

And if you’re feeling lost, disconnected, or anxious—maybe it’s not freedom you’re missing. Maybe it’s belonging.”

Topic 5: Can You Choose Happiness Through Ideology?

Main Question: If conservatives report higher happiness, should unhappy liberals reconsider their beliefs?

Moderator: Charlie Kirk
Panelists:

• Vivek Ramaswamy – Entrepreneur, cultural conservative, author of Nation of Victims

• Marianne Williamson – Spiritual progressive, former presidential candidate

• Dr. Gregg Henriques – Psychologist, expert in integrative mental health and belief systems

• Lena – Gen Z centrist recovering from political burnout

• Russell Brand – Former liberal activist turned spiritual provocateur

🎙️ Opening by Charlie Kirk:

“51% of conservatives say they’re very happy. Only 20% of liberals say the same.

This isn’t just coincidence—it’s ideological impact.

So here’s the question: Can you choose a different belief system—and in doing so, choose a happier life?

Let’s talk about what worldviews actually do to people—not just what they claim to fight for.”

❓First Question:

Do you believe political ideology can significantly shape someone’s emotional well-being and happiness?

Vivek Ramaswamy:
Yes, absolutely. An ideology rooted in gratitude, responsibility, and faith will give you strength. One rooted in victimhood and resentment will consume you. What you believe isn’t just abstract—it becomes your emotional baseline.

Marianne Williamson:
Beliefs matter—but not just Left vs. Right. Are your beliefs rooted in fear or in love? Many liberals I know are exhausted because they’ve lost their spiritual core. But conservatism without compassion is also toxic. The answer isn’t sides—it’s soul.

Lena:
I was all in on activism. Climate, race, gender, everything. But I started to feel emotionally hollow, even while “doing good.” I stepped back, unplugged—and realized I was living from crisis to crisis. So yes—ideology shapes how you feel. It can also trap you.

Dr. Gregg Henriques:
Beliefs form the lens through which we interpret life. If your system constantly highlights threat, oppression, and chaos—you’ll feel anxious. If it emphasizes agency, structure, and connection—you’ll feel more stable. This is psychological architecture, not opinion.

Russell Brand:
I used to think politics would save us. Now I believe inner transformation is the only revolution that matters. Liberals chase justice but ignore grace. Conservatives chase order but sometimes lose empathy. Either path without love is madness.

❓Second Question:

If someone is deeply unhappy, should they examine whether their ideology is part of the problem?

Charlie Kirk (moderator):
It might be uncomfortable, but we have to ask: if your worldview makes you miserable—why hold onto it?

Marianne Williamson:
Because pain can feel righteous. But righteousness isn’t the same as wisdom. If your beliefs are draining your spirit, it’s time to return to the heart, not just the ballot.

Vivek Ramaswamy:
It’s not enough to switch political teams. You have to ditch the resentment mindset. That’s the root of the misery—not just being liberal, but being trapped in grievance and self-justification. Let go of that—and joy returns.

Lena:
I had to unlearn the idea that being angry made me morally superior. Once I let that go, I could breathe. Now I don’t even care if my politics “win”—I just want to live without constant outrage.

Russell Brand:
Your ideology should liberate, not dominate. If you’re addicted to being right—or being a victim—you’re not free. You’re branded. Trade your rage for reality. Start with the divine, not the debate.

Dr. Gregg Henriques:
We need an epistemological detox. Step back. Reflect. Ask yourself: Is this belief system increasing your coherence and vitality—or just reinforcing your despair? That question can save lives.

❓Third Question:

What would you say to someone who’s liberal, unhappy, but scared to change what they believe—because they fear losing their identity or friends?

Vivek Ramaswamy:
Truth is worth the cost. If your friends can’t handle your growth, they weren’t friends—they were political allies. Pick freedom over fitting in. You owe that to yourself.

Marianne Williamson:
I’d say: Don’t walk away from who you are. Walk deeper into your values—but anchored in love, not ideology. That’s how you transform, not betray, your path.

Lena:
It’s hard. I lost people. But I gained peace. I stopped performing. You can be liberal, conservative, spiritual, or none of it—but if you’re not authentically yourself, you’ll always feel fragmented.

Russell Brand:
You don’t need to “switch sides.” You need to drop the story that your worth is tied to your tribe. Walk your own path. And trust: love will meet you there.

Dr. Gregg Henriques:
Identity should serve well-being—not the other way around. If your ideology makes you sick, the cost of staying the same is greater than the fear of change. Heal first. Belong later.

🔚 Closing by Charlie Kirk:

“If your beliefs are breaking you—break up with them.

Happiness isn’t random. It’s built on ideas. And the wrong ideas—resentment, victimhood, envy—can rot your soul.

Don’t stay loyal to what hurts you. Choose the truth. Choose strength. Choose joy.

And maybe… just maybe… choose to think a little more like a conservative.”

Final Thoughts by Charlie Kirk

You’ve heard the numbers. You’ve heard the stories. You’ve seen how belief systems don’t just reflect your life—they help shape it.

Liberalism today increasingly teaches fragility, grievance, and identity obsession. It doesn’t surprise me that this produces emotional burnout.

Conservatism, at its best, offers grounding: faith in God, strength through family, meaning through responsibility. And that shows up in the happiness gap.

But don’t take my word for it. Look at your own life. Ask yourself:

• Is my worldview lifting me—or draining me?

• Are my beliefs giving me strength—or stealing my joy?

• Am I building something solid—or reacting to everything I hate?

If the answers make you uncomfortable, maybe it’s time to rethink the framework.

This isn’t just about politics. It’s about your peace. And your future.

Short Bios:

Charlie Kirk
Founder of Turning Point USA, conservative commentator known for connecting faith, culture, and political ideology to real-world outcomes.

Nate Silver
Statistician and founder of FiveThirtyEight, recognized for his data-driven political and social analysis across partisan lines.

Dr. Jean Twenge
Psychologist and author of iGen, expert in generational trends, digital culture, and mental health statistics.

Jonathan Haidt
Social psychologist and NYU professor, author of The Righteous Mind, explores how values and morality shape political identity.

Allie Beth Stuckey
Host of Relatable podcast, Christian conservative speaker focused on culture, mental health, and biblical womanhood.

Ben Shapiro
Conservative political analyst, co-founder of The Daily Wire, known for rapid-fire commentary on culture, logic, and ideology.

Cornel West
Progressive philosopher and public intellectual, advocates for radical love, justice, and the moral roots of democracy.

Dr. Jordan Peterson
Clinical psychologist and author of 12 Rules for Life, explores meaning, responsibility, and the psychological dangers of resentment.

Zoe
Gen Z socialist college student and activist, vocal advocate for economic equity, identity rights, and systemic reform.

Douglas Murray
British author and cultural critic, warns against identity politics and the ideological decay of Western liberalism.

Dennis Prager
Conservative radio host and Jewish scholar, founder of PragerU, promotes traditional values and God-centered moral frameworks.

Rev. William Barber
Progressive pastor and civil rights leader, founder of the Poor People’s Campaign, emphasizes faith-based activism for justice.

Dr. Lisa Miller
Columbia University psychologist and author of The Awakened Brain, explores the clinical link between spirituality and resilience.

Emma
Former evangelical Christian turned spiritual-but-not-religious Gen Z voice, navigating faith deconstruction and inner healing.

Andrew Tate
Controversial internet figure and recent religious convert, emphasizes discipline, masculinity, and spiritual structure.

J.D. Vance
U.S. Senator and author of Hillbilly Elegy, advocates for family stability, working-class resilience, and conservative renewal.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)
Progressive U.S. congresswoman, advocates for economic justice, intersectional feminism, and redefining modern family structures.

Brad Wilcox
Director of the National Marriage Project, sociologist specializing in the link between marriage, fatherhood, and well-being.

Noah
Gen Z relationship advocate, speaks on polyamory, chosen family, and non-traditional paths to love and emotional stability.

Heather Mac Donald
Author and Manhattan Institute fellow, critiques modern identity politics and defends tradition, law, and family order.

Vivek Ramaswamy
Entrepreneur and author of Nation of Victims, cultural conservative pushing for agency, merit, and post-woke capitalism.

Marianne Williamson
Spiritual teacher and author of A Return to Love, advocates for progressive politics rooted in divine compassion and healing.

Dr. Gregg Henriques
Clinical psychologist and theorist of the Unified Theory of Knowledge, bridges psychology and philosophy of meaning.

Lena
Gen Z centrist and former activist, speaks on emotional burnout, ideological disillusionment, and personal transformation.

Russell Brand
Comedian-turned-spiritual commentator, known for rejecting political binaries in favor of truth-seeking and awakening.