Spiritual Awakening: Rediscovering Faith and Unity

Welcome to an incredibly thought-provoking and transformative discussion today. I’m thrilled to introduce a powerful conversation that delves deep into the roots of early Christianity and the ongoing spiritual awakening happening in our world. Joining us are some of the most influential thinkers and scholars who have spent their lives exploring these crucial topics—Aaron Abke, Bart Ehrman, Elaine Pagels, James Tabor, Karen Armstrong, and Richard Rohr. Together, they will shed light on one of the most significant theological conflicts: the schism between Paul and Jesus’s disciples, a historical divergence that has shaped the very foundation of Christianity.

We’ll dive into the profound implications of rediscovering the true gospel of Jesus and examine the hidden truths behind the Dead Sea Scrolls—ancient documents that could change how we view the early church forever. But it doesn’t stop there. We’re also going to talk about the Vatican and how religious institutions have evolved, often in ways that may seem far removed from the original teachings of Jesus.

And, of course, we can’t ignore what’s happening today. There is an undeniable spiritual awakening sweeping across the globe. More people than ever are seeking deeper meaning, truth, and connection. Our panelists will offer their unique insights into how this shift is redefining faith, purpose, and living a life of love and service. I invite you to stay with us and open your heart as we explore these timeless questions and modern transformations in the world of spirituality. Let’s get started!

The Schism Between Paul and Jesus’s Disciples

Nick Sasaki (Moderator): Welcome to today's discussion, where we delve into an intriguing and critical topic. This is an issue that touches the very heart of Christian history and theology, one that shaped the future of Christianity. To start us off, I'll hand it over to Aaron Abke, who will introduce the complexities of this schism and its profound significance.

Aaron Abke: Thanks, Nick. The division between Paul and Jesus’s disciples is one of the most significant theological rifts in early Christianity. On one side, you had Paul, a Pharisee who never met Jesus during his life but had a dramatic conversion experience. On the other, you had Jesus’s original disciples, led by James, his brother, who followed Jesus's teachings closely.

The central issue of this schism lies in how they interpreted Jesus's message. Paul's version of Christianity was more cosmopolitan, aimed at Gentiles, and placed heavy emphasis on grace, faith, and the abandonment of Mosaic law. Jesus's disciples, particularly James, held tightly to Jewish traditions and the moral and ethical teachings Jesus emphasized. This rift, though often downplayed, raises crucial questions about which version of the gospel should be considered closer to Jesus's original teachings.

Bart, you’ve done significant work on early Christian history—what’s your take on this divide?

Bart Ehrman (Biblical Scholar): Aaron is right to emphasize the deep tension between Paul and the Jerusalem Church led by James. Paul saw himself as the apostle to the Gentiles and believed that his interpretation of Jesus’s death and resurrection transcended the traditional Jewish framework. In his letters, you see Paul directly critiquing the leaders in Jerusalem. For example, in Galatians, Paul recalls a confrontation with Peter, accusing him of hypocrisy. This shows a real clash of ideologies—Paul advocated for a version of Christianity that was far more inclusive of Gentiles, while the Jerusalem church wanted to maintain continuity with Jewish law.

Nick Sasaki: Elaine, what can you tell us about the role of James and the other disciples in this conflict?

Elaine Pagels (Author and Religious Historian): The role of James is essential, as he was seen as the leader of the early Jesus movement after the crucifixion. James’s authority came not only from being Jesus’s brother but from his strict adherence to the Jewish law. Early sources, like the Acts of the Apostles, paint a picture of the Jerusalem community as being deeply Jewish. The conflict with Paul likely centered on Paul’s theology, which suggested that adherence to the law was no longer necessary for salvation. This divide became particularly clear as Paul’s influence spread to Gentile communities.

Nick Sasaki: James, what’s your historical perspective on this schism?

James Tabor (Biblical Historian): From a historical standpoint, the split between Paul and the disciples was inevitable. Paul’s vision of a universal gospel required loosening the traditional Jewish restrictions, while the Jerusalem church was still rooted in the religious identity of Israel. Paul’s letters often reveal frustration with the Jerusalem leaders, particularly in terms of their reluctance to fully embrace his mission to the Gentiles. The Dead Sea Scrolls also offer fascinating insights into the apocalyptic expectations of the period, which were shared by the early Jesus movement but diverged from Paul’s focus on personal salvation through Christ.

Nick Sasaki: Karen, how do you think this schism shaped the future of Christianity?

Karen Armstrong (Religious Scholar): This split set the stage for the development of Christian orthodoxy. Paul's emphasis on faith, grace, and the rejection of the Mosaic law appealed to a broader audience, especially in the Greco-Roman world, which is likely why Pauline Christianity became dominant. Over time, the teachings of James and the Jerusalem Church were overshadowed, and the institutional Church—especially after Constantine—embraced a more Pauline interpretation of Christianity.

Nick Sasaki: Richard, what can we take from this schism in terms of spiritual growth and personal faith today?

Richard Rohr (Franciscan Priest and Spiritual Teacher): I think this schism invites us to rethink the foundations of our faith. We can ask ourselves, “What would Jesus’s original teachings look like if they hadn’t been filtered through later interpretations?” Returning to a more direct, love-centered approach that focuses on unity and service rather than dogma is the spiritual challenge we face today.

Nick Sasaki: A fascinating discussion! We’ve touched on how this historical schism influences both theological understanding and spiritual practice today.

Rediscovering the True Gospel of Jesus

Nick Sasaki: Welcome back, everyone. Now we turn to our second topic. There’s been a lot of discussion and debate about what Jesus’s true message was, especially considering the schism we talked about earlier. To help us navigate this, Aaron, could you kick things off and give us some insight into what you believe to be the core of Jesus’s message?

Aaron Abke: Thanks, Nick. When we talk about rediscovering the true gospel of Jesus, we’re really asking what Jesus himself taught versus what later interpretations might have imposed. Jesus’s gospel is fundamentally about repentance, obedience, and service. In the red-letter teachings found in the Gospels, we see Jesus emphasizing the Kingdom of Heaven as something here and now, not as a distant promise. His focus was on transforming the heart, loving God and neighbor, and living in alignment with divine will. Jesus never spoke of himself as a figure to be worshipped in the way later theology often presents him. Instead, he called people to follow a way of life centered on love, compassion, and humility.

Bart, how do you see the message of Jesus compared to how it’s been shaped by historical developments?

Bart Ehrman (Biblical Scholar): One of the key shifts that happened early on was the move from Jesus’s message about the imminent Kingdom of God to a focus on Jesus himself as the means of salvation. Jesus’s earliest teachings were about preparing for the coming reign of God on earth, a restoration of peace and justice. However, as Christianity developed, especially under Paul’s influence, the focus shifted to the person of Jesus—his death, resurrection, and the promise of eternal life through faith in him. This transition played a huge role in shaping Christian doctrine, but it also led to a significant divergence from the message that Jesus originally preached.

Nick Sasaki: Elaine, you’ve written extensively about the Gnostic texts. How do those alternative gospels shed light on what might have been Jesus’s true message?

Elaine Pagels (Author and Religious Historian): The Gnostic Gospels give us a glimpse into early Christian communities that emphasized personal spiritual knowledge or gnosis rather than institutionalized dogma. In texts like the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus is depicted more as a wisdom teacher, guiding individuals to awaken to the divine light within themselves. These teachings suggest that Jesus’s message was not about worshipping him as the Son of God, but about realizing one’s own connection to the divine. It’s a radically different perspective, one that resonates with modern seekers who are disillusioned by traditional dogmatic structures.

Nick Sasaki: James, from a historical standpoint, how do we trace this evolution of Jesus’s teachings?

James Tabor (Biblical Historian): Historically, we can trace this evolution through the early Christian writings, particularly the synoptic Gospels, and later works like John and the Pauline letters. In the earliest sources, like Mark, Jesus is portrayed primarily as a Jewish prophet and teacher. But by the time we get to John’s Gospel and Paul’s letters, Jesus is presented more as a divine figure, the incarnate Word, who must be believed in for salvation. This development reflects how the early Christian movement grew and adapted, especially as it moved into non-Jewish communities in the Roman Empire.

Nick Sasaki: Karen, what do you think modern Christians can learn from rediscovering Jesus’s original teachings?

Karen Armstrong (Religious Scholar): Rediscovering the original teachings of Jesus could help modern Christians return to a focus on love, compassion, and justice. Jesus’s ethical teachings—such as loving your enemies, caring for the poor, and seeking peace—are timeless and relevant. Unfortunately, much of this has been overshadowed by theological debates about doctrine and dogma. If Christians today could re-embrace these core teachings, I think we’d see a more compassionate and inclusive form of Christianity emerge.

Nick Sasaki: Richard, from a spiritual perspective, how do you see the value in rediscovering Jesus’s message?

Richard Rohr (Franciscan Priest and Spiritual Teacher): Rediscovering Jesus’s true message is essential for spiritual growth. Jesus didn’t just give us a set of beliefs to follow; he showed us a way of life that is centered in love and service. His gospel is about transforming our hearts and minds so that we live out the values of the Kingdom here on earth. For me, it’s about embodying the Christ consciousness—seeing the divine in everyone and everything. In doing so, we become agents of love and healing in the world.

Nick Sasaki: Thank you, everyone. It’s clear that rediscovering the true gospel of Jesus can have profound implications for both personal spiritual growth and for how we approach our faith today.

The Significance of the Dead Sea Scrolls

Our next topic is one of great historical and spiritual significance. These ancient texts, discovered in 1947, have created quite a stir in both religious and academic circles. Let’s explore what they tell us about early Christianity, Jewish traditions, and their implications for our understanding of Jesus and his teachings. Aaron, could you start by laying the groundwork for us?

Aaron Abke: Certainly, Nick. The Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered in the Qumran caves, date back to around the time of Jesus and contain some of the earliest known biblical manuscripts. What’s fascinating is that they not only provide insight into the religious practices and beliefs of Jewish sects at the time but also seem to have direct correlations with the early Christian movement. Many scholars believe that the scrolls give us a window into the Essenes, a Jewish group that likely had ties with John the Baptist and Jesus himself. These texts speak about messianic expectations, apocalyptic visions, and a deep commitment to following the law of Moses—ideas that were highly relevant during Jesus’s time.

Bart, could you expand on how the Dead Sea Scrolls connect to the early Christian movement?

Bart Ehrman (Biblical Scholar): Yes, Aaron, you’re absolutely right. One of the most interesting aspects of the Dead Sea Scrolls is their focus on messianism and apocalyptic thought, which aligns with the themes of early Christianity. The scrolls talk about a “Teacher of Righteousness” who would come to lead the people, and although this figure isn’t explicitly Jesus, there are clear parallels to Jesus’s role in Christianity. What’s even more compelling is that the scrolls suggest there was a significant diversity of beliefs about the Messiah and the end times in the first century. This diversity helps us understand the broader context in which Jesus and his followers preached, and how certain interpretations of messianism, including Paul's, became dominant.

Nick Sasaki: Elaine, how do the Gnostic texts and other early Christian writings relate to the ideas presented in the Dead Sea Scrolls?

Elaine Pagels (Author and Religious Historian): The Dead Sea Scrolls reveal a world that was deeply divided on how to interpret sacred texts and religious law, which resonates with the kind of theological debates we see in early Christianity. Like the Gnostic writings, the scrolls reflect a variety of spiritual perspectives that coexisted during the Second Temple period. The emphasis on secret knowledge, community purity, and apocalyptic visions in the Dead Sea Scrolls bears some similarity to Gnostic ideas of spiritual enlightenment and the duality of light and darkness. It shows us that early Christianity wasn’t born in a vacuum but was part of a much larger religious discourse happening at the time.

Nick Sasaki: James, from a historical perspective, how did the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls impact our understanding of early Jewish and Christian thought?

James Tabor (Biblical Historian): The Dead Sea Scrolls fundamentally changed our understanding of both Judaism and early Christianity. Before their discovery, we had a much more limited view of the diversity of Jewish thought in the Second Temple period. The scrolls demonstrate that groups like the Essenes were apocalyptic, believed in a coming messianic age, and were deeply critical of the religious establishment. This mirrors the criticisms that Jesus had of the Pharisees and the Temple elite. Moreover, the scrolls show us that the divide between Judaism and Christianity was not as clear-cut as we once thought—there was a great deal of overlap in their beliefs about the end times and the coming of a Messiah.

Nick Sasaki: Karen, what do the Dead Sea Scrolls reveal about the broader religious climate at the time of Jesus?

Karen Armstrong (Religious Scholar): The Dead Sea Scrolls highlight the intense spiritual fervor of the time. Many of the texts reflect a sense of urgency, with people believing that they were living in the end times. There’s a focus on purity, communal living, and strict adherence to the law, which suggests that many Jews were searching for a way to live in alignment with God’s will during turbulent times. Jesus’s message, which also emphasized an imminent Kingdom of God, would have resonated with this climate of religious expectation. The Dead Sea Scrolls help us see Jesus not just as a singular figure but as part of a broader movement seeking spiritual renewal and transformation.

Nick Sasaki: Richard, from a spiritual perspective, how do the Dead Sea Scrolls challenge or reinforce our modern understanding of faith?

Richard Rohr (Franciscan Priest and Spiritual Teacher): The Dead Sea Scrolls remind us that the search for truth and spiritual depth is timeless. The people who wrote these texts were deeply committed to living out their beliefs in a way that was often countercultural, and that’s something we can learn from today. In a way, these ancient communities were on their own spiritual quest, just as we are now. They were seeking to understand their place in the divine plan and how to live in harmony with God’s will. In rediscovering these texts, we’re reminded that faith is not static—it’s a living, evolving journey that requires us to question, learn, and grow.

Nick Sasaki: Thank you, everyone, for your profound insights. The Dead Sea Scrolls, much like the true gospel of Jesus, offer a deeper understanding of the complexities and spiritual fervor of the time. These ancient texts not only provide historical context but also invite us to reflect on our own spiritual journeys today.

Critique of the Vatican and Religious Institutions

Nick Sasaki: Our fourth topic for today is an important one.  We’re diving deep into the historical, cultural, and theological implications of how religious institutions, especially the Vatican, have influenced and, at times, distorted the message of Jesus. Aaron, can you start us off by shedding light on the historical context?

Aaron Abke: Thanks, Nick. The critique of religious institutions, particularly the Vatican, stems from their long history of consolidating power and shaping doctrine in ways that don’t always align with the original teachings of Jesus. Historically, the Vatican became the epicenter of Christianity, and over centuries, it amassed significant political, economic, and spiritual influence. But with this influence came decisions that often deviated from Jesus’s message of humility, love, and service. The wealth, opulence, and authority of the Vatican have led many to question whether its practices reflect the teachings of Christ, especially when Jesus advocated for living humbly and serving others. This isn’t to discredit the entire institution but rather to examine how human ambition and institutional power can sometimes overshadow the core spiritual teachings they were meant to uphold.

Bart, I’m curious about your take on how the early church developed and the Vatican’s role in shaping Christian doctrine.

Bart Ehrman (Biblical Scholar): Aaron makes an important point. The early church was quite diverse, and different factions interpreted Jesus’s message in various ways. The consolidation of power within the Vatican, particularly after the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, led to the formalization of certain doctrines—often at the expense of other Christian interpretations. As the Roman Empire embraced Christianity, the Vatican took on a more hierarchical structure, mirroring political systems of the time. This shift contributed to the centralization of religious authority and the development of dogma that sometimes strayed from Jesus’s original teachings of love, inclusivity, and compassion. The irony is that Jesus often critiqued the religious authorities of his day for being more concerned with power than with serving the people—a criticism that can apply to religious institutions throughout history.

Nick Sasaki: Elaine, how does this centralization of power relate to your research on Gnosticism and alternative Christianities?

Elaine Pagels (Author and Religious Historian): What we see with the Vatican’s rise is a narrowing of the theological diversity that characterized early Christianity. Gnostic Christians, for example, had a more mystical approach to Jesus’s teachings, emphasizing personal spiritual knowledge and direct communion with the divine. But as the Vatican established itself, these alternative viewpoints were labeled as heretical, and many of their texts were suppressed or destroyed. The institutionalization of the faith led to the dominance of a particular narrative, one that aligned with the Vatican’s authority. This institutional control created a unified doctrine, but it also marginalized voices that offered different, often more individualistic, interpretations of Jesus’s message.

Nick Sasaki: James, from a historical perspective, how did the Vatican come to accumulate such wealth and influence, and how has that shaped its role in the world?

James Tabor (Biblical Historian): Historically, the Vatican’s accumulation of wealth and influence is tied to its close relationship with political powers, starting with the Roman Empire. After Christianity became the official religion of Rome, the Vatican became a central institution, amassing land, wealth, and political influence over the centuries. This culminated in the vast wealth of the Catholic Church, much of which is still visible in places like the Vatican Museum and St. Peter’s Basilica. This wealth, however, often stands in stark contrast to the teachings of Jesus, who spoke against materialism and urged his followers to serve the poor and marginalized. This discrepancy has fueled critiques that the Vatican, in its quest for power and influence, has lost touch with the spiritual essence of Christianity.

Nick Sasaki: Karen, what do you think are the spiritual and ethical implications of this critique of religious institutions like the Vatican?

Karen Armstrong (Religious Scholar): The ethical implications are profound. On one hand, religious institutions like the Vatican have played a significant role in preserving spiritual traditions, fostering community, and promoting peace and justice. However, when these institutions prioritize wealth, power, and dogma over the core spiritual message, they risk alienating people who are seeking authentic spiritual connection. Many are now looking for a more personal, direct experience of the divine, unmediated by institutions. This has contributed to the rise of alternative spiritual movements and a general distrust of organized religion. The challenge for institutions like the Vatican is to return to the heart of Jesus’s teachings—service to others, love, and humility—while re-evaluating their own structures of power.

Nick Sasaki: Richard, how can modern spiritual seekers navigate their faith while recognizing the imperfections of religious institutions?

Richard Rohr (Franciscan Priest and Spiritual Teacher): I think it’s important for spiritual seekers to understand that no institution, including the Vatican, is perfect. The key is to hold space for both critique and compassion. Institutions like the Vatican have done much good in the world, but they are also human-made structures that can fall into the traps of power and ego. What I encourage is a return to the basics: the teachings of love, service, and humility that Jesus embodied. Seekers can engage with religious traditions while also critically assessing how those traditions align with their spiritual values. It’s not about throwing everything out, but rather discerning what truly resonates with the spirit of Jesus’s message.

Nick Sasaki: Thank you, everyone. It’s clear that while the Vatican and other religious institutions have played a significant role in the development of Christianity, they are not beyond critique. As spiritual seekers, it’s important to continually ask how these institutions align with the core teachings of compassion, love, and humility.

The Ongoing Spiritual Awakening

Nick Sasaki: Our fifth and final topic today.  In our conversation so far, we’ve delved into the historical and institutional challenges within Christianity, but now, we turn our focus to something more contemporary—the global movement toward a spiritual awakening. Aaron, you’ve spoken a lot about this phenomenon in your work. Could you introduce this topic and share why it’s so significant?

Aaron Abke: Absolutely, Nick. The ongoing spiritual awakening is one of the most exciting developments of our time. We’re seeing people from all walks of life starting to question the old structures of religion and spirituality. This awakening isn’t just about leaving behind the religious institutions or the doctrines that no longer resonate, but about turning inward to discover a deeper, personal connection with the divine. It’s about realizing that true spirituality doesn’t have to be mediated by an institution—it’s within us.

At its core, this movement is about shifting from fear-based paradigms, where spirituality is tied to punishment and control, to a love-based paradigm, where the emphasis is on unity, compassion, and service. As more people awaken to this realization, we’re witnessing a collective transformation that transcends the boundaries of any one religion or belief system.

Nick Sasaki: Bart, how do you see this modern spiritual awakening in relation to the historical shifts in religious belief?

Bart Ehrman (Biblical Scholar): What’s happening now has parallels to historical shifts we’ve seen throughout history, especially after major events like the Reformation. People reach a point where they can no longer reconcile the institutionalized doctrines with their personal spiritual experiences. This leads to a kind of spiritual revolution, where new forms of belief emerge. In the current awakening, I see a shift away from dogmatic religion and towards individual spiritual experiences. While this can lead to a more fragmented religious landscape, it also opens up the possibility for people to explore spirituality on their own terms.

Nick Sasaki: Elaine, in your research on Gnosticism, you’ve highlighted how early Christians sought personal spiritual enlightenment. How does that connect with today’s awakening?

Elaine Pagels (Author and Religious Historian): The Gnostic tradition has always been about inner knowing, or gnosis, as the path to spiritual awakening. Gnostics didn’t believe that a priest or institution could grant salvation—rather, it was through personal insight and direct experience of the divine. This resonates strongly with what we’re seeing today, where people are looking for direct, unmediated encounters with the spiritual realm. In a way, this modern awakening is a continuation of ancient Gnostic ideas, emphasizing personal spirituality over external religious authority.

Nick Sasaki: James, from a historical perspective, how do you see this spiritual awakening in light of previous religious reforms?

James Tabor (Biblical Historian): Throughout history, spiritual awakenings have often been accompanied by a rejection of the old guard. The Protestant Reformation, for example, was a response to the corruption within the Catholic Church, and it led to the decentralization of religious authority. What’s happening today is similar, but it’s more widespread and more personal. It’s not about forming a new religious movement but about each individual taking responsibility for their own spiritual journey. This awakening also aligns with broader cultural shifts toward self-reliance and skepticism of institutions.

Nick Sasaki: Karen, how do you think this awakening will shape the future of religion and spirituality?

Karen Armstrong (Religious Scholar): I believe we are moving into an era where religion and spirituality will be less about institutions and more about personal practice. As people continue to awaken, we’ll see a rise in interspirituality—where individuals draw from a variety of traditions to form their own spiritual practices. This might mean incorporating meditation, mindfulness, or service-oriented activities from different religious traditions into daily life. The challenge for religious institutions will be how they adapt to this shift. Instead of dictating belief, they may need to serve as guides or facilitators of individual spiritual exploration.

Nick Sasaki: Richard, you’ve written extensively about spirituality and consciousness. How do you see this awakening unfolding on a practical level for individuals?

Richard Rohr (Franciscan Priest and Spiritual Teacher): The key to this spiritual awakening is moving beyond dualistic thinking—this idea that we are separate from the divine, from each other, and from the earth. As we awaken, we realize that we are all interconnected, and this changes everything about how we live. Spirituality becomes less about what we believe and more about how we embody those beliefs in our actions, how we serve others, and how we live in harmony with the world around us. The awakening isn’t something abstract—it’s deeply practical and it calls for a new way of being in the world.

Nick Sasaki: Thank you, everyone. This spiritual awakening represents a profound shift in how humanity understands and interacts with the divine. It’s exciting to think about how this awakening will continue to unfold and what it means for the future of spirituality on a global scale.

Short Bios: