Who Is Jesus: Understanding His Legacy and Relevance Today

Pope Francis:
Dear friends, we gather today to reflect on one of the most profound and transformative figures in human history: Jesus of Nazareth. His life, his teachings, and his love have touched billions of hearts across centuries, transcending borders, cultures, and even faiths. Yet, the question remains as fresh as ever: Who is Jesus?

In every age, people have sought to understand him, to follow him, and, sometimes, to define him according to their own times and needs. Was he a revolutionary, calling for justice in a world of inequality? A spiritual guide, showing us the way to God and to each other? Or perhaps, as many believe, he is the Son of God, the divine presence among us? These questions have inspired generations of seekers, scholars, and believers.

Today, we have a unique opportunity. We bring together voices from different walks of life—historians, theologians, psychologists, and even those who explore the mystical and esoteric dimensions of faith. Together, they will reflect on Jesus’ message and its relevance for our world today.

In this spirit of dialogue, I invite you to listen with open hearts and minds. May this imaginary conversation help us not only to know Jesus more deeply but also to live out his teachings in our lives. As he himself said, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life.’ Let us embark on this journey together.

Who Was Jesus: Man, Myth, or Divine?

Moderator:
Welcome, everyone. Today, we gather to discuss one of the most profound and thought-provoking questions: Who was Jesus—man, myth, or divine? Joining us are N.T. Wright, esteemed New Testament scholar; Bart Ehrman, historian and author on early Christianity; Dolores Cannon, regression therapist and esoteric thinker; and Carl Jung, renowned psychologist. Let’s begin with the historical perspective. Dr. Ehrman, how do you view Jesus?

Bart Ehrman:
Thank you. From a historical standpoint, Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher in first-century Palestine. He was a man of his time, deeply rooted in Jewish traditions, who believed the world was about to change dramatically. His teachings and actions reflect a radical critique of the socio-religious order, but there’s no concrete historical evidence to support claims of divinity or miraculous events.

Moderator:
Fascinating. Dr. Wright, how do you reconcile this with the theological perspective?

N.T. Wright:
While I respect Dr. Ehrman’s historical rigor, I believe the historical Jesus cannot be separated from the theological Christ. The resurrection is central—it’s not merely a theological assertion but a historical claim. Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection fulfill the Jewish expectation of God’s intervention in history. His divinity is not a later myth but intrinsic to his identity as the Messiah.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, your work ventures into metaphysical realms. What do you uncover about Jesus through your regression sessions?

Dolores Cannon:
In my sessions, individuals have accessed memories of past lives and interactions with Jesus. They describe him as a profoundly loving and enlightened being, whose teachings transcended time and space. He was deeply aware of his dual nature—human and divine—and came to Earth to guide humanity towards higher consciousness. From this perspective, his miracles are not myths but manifestations of his mastery over universal laws.

Moderator:
Dr. Jung, from a psychological standpoint, how do you interpret Jesus’ identity?

Carl Jung:
Jesus represents a profound archetype—the Self, the unification of opposites. He embodies the divine and human, light and shadow. This duality resonates deeply within the human psyche, making him a central figure in the collective unconscious. His story, whether literal or symbolic, provides a path toward individuation, the process of realizing one’s wholeness.

Moderator:
This is an incredible spectrum of perspectives. Dr. Ehrman, how would you respond to claims of divinity from a historical viewpoint?

Bart Ehrman:
I’d argue that the idea of Jesus as divine emerged over time. Early Christians didn’t view him as God but as a prophet or messianic figure. The doctrine of divinity developed later, influenced by Greco-Roman ideas and theological debates.

Moderator:
Dr. Wright, would you agree with that timeline?

N.T. Wright:
Not entirely. While it’s true that theological formulations evolved, the belief in Jesus’ divinity was present in the earliest Christian communities. The resurrection convinced his followers that Jesus was not merely a prophet but the embodiment of God’s presence.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, your insights suggest Jesus was aware of his dual nature. Could this align with theological or psychological interpretations?

Dolores Cannon:
Absolutely. Jesus understood his role as a bridge between humanity and the divine. He taught that we all have a spark of divinity, encouraging us to awaken to our higher selves. His message was universal, transcending religious structures.

Moderator:
Dr. Jung, does this idea of awakening resonate with your archetypal framework?

Carl Jung:
Certainly. Jesus’ teachings reflect the archetypal journey of transformation. His life and resurrection symbolize death to the ego and rebirth into spiritual wholeness. Whether one views him as divine or symbolic, his story speaks to the deepest layers of the human experience.

Moderator:
Before we close, let’s reflect: What do you believe Jesus would want us to focus on today? Dr. Wright?

N.T. Wright:
Jesus would call us to justice, mercy, and faithfulness—values that transcend time. His life points us toward reconciliation and the establishment of God’s kingdom on Earth.

Moderator:
Dr. Ehrman?

Bart Ehrman:
I think Jesus would emphasize compassion and humility. Regardless of theological beliefs, his teachings on love and service remain universally relevant.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon?

Dolores Cannon:
Jesus would remind us of our interconnectedness and urge us to raise our consciousness to create a harmonious world.

Moderator:
Dr. Jung?

Carl Jung:
He would encourage us to seek inner balance and confront our shadows. Jesus embodies the path to wholeness, an ideal worth striving for in any era.

Moderator:
Thank you all for this illuminating discussion. Whether man, myth, or divine, Jesus continues to inspire profound reflection and dialogue. His story remains one of the most compelling in human history. Let us carry these insights forward in our own journeys.

The Lost Years of Jesus: What Do We Really Know?

Moderator:
Welcome, everyone. Today, we gather to discuss a fascinating and mysterious topic: The Lost Years of Jesus—what happened between the ages of 12 and 30, a period absent from canonical texts? Our panel includes Dolores Cannon, regression therapist and esoteric thinker; Rudolf Steiner, anthroposophist and mystic; Reza Aslan, historian and scholar of religions; and Karen Armstrong, expert in comparative religion. Let’s start with the historical context. Dr. Aslan, what do we know historically about this period?

Reza Aslan:
Historically, we have almost no concrete evidence about Jesus’ activities during these years. The Gospels are silent, and no contemporary sources mention him. However, we can infer some possibilities based on his later teachings. He likely remained in Nazareth, working as a carpenter and living a devout Jewish life. It’s also plausible he traveled within Galilee, learning from teachers and observing diverse traditions.

Moderator:
Ms. Armstrong, does this historical gap invite speculation about Jesus’ spiritual formation?

Karen Armstrong:
Absolutely. The absence of records creates fertile ground for theories. As a devout Jew, Jesus would have been deeply rooted in the Torah and the teachings of his community. However, his later emphasis on love, forgiveness, and inclusivity suggests he may have been influenced by broader philosophical or spiritual ideas. This period might have been one of profound personal and spiritual development.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, your regression sessions explore these lost years. What insights can you share?

Dolores Cannon:
Through regression sessions, several subjects described Jesus traveling to places like India, Tibet, and Egypt. They spoke of him studying with spiritual masters, learning healing techniques, and deepening his understanding of universal truths. This aligns with the esoteric idea that Jesus prepared for his mission by immersing himself in diverse spiritual traditions, which later influenced his teachings.

Moderator:
Mr. Steiner, your anthroposophical perspective suggests a spiritual evolution. How do you interpret this gap in Jesus’ life?

Rudolf Steiner:
I view these years as a time of inner transformation and preparation. Jesus, as a bearer of the Christ impulse, was integrating divine and human consciousness. According to spiritual science, he may have sought wisdom in the Mystery Schools of Egypt or encountered teachings in the East that contributed to his profound understanding of humanity and divinity.

Moderator:
Dr. Aslan, how do you respond to the idea of Jesus traveling outside Judea during these years?

Reza Aslan:
While intriguing, there’s no historical evidence to support such claims. The idea of Jesus in India or Egypt likely stems from later attempts to universalize his message. That said, his exposure to diverse ideas within Jewish and Hellenistic cultures cannot be dismissed entirely.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, do you think the lack of historical evidence undermines esoteric accounts of Jesus’ travels?

Dolores Cannon:
Not at all. The absence of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence. Regression insights offer a different lens—one that focuses on spiritual truths rather than historical documentation. These accounts suggest Jesus’ teachings drew from a profound synthesis of wisdom traditions.

Moderator:
Ms. Armstrong, could this synthesis explain the uniqueness of Jesus’ teachings within his Jewish context?

Karen Armstrong:
It’s possible. Jesus’ teachings often emphasized universal principles—love, compassion, humility—that transcended Jewish law. Whether this was the result of external influences or his own spiritual evolution, it marked him as a transformative figure within his community.

Moderator:
Mr. Steiner, how might Jesus’ potential exposure to Eastern or Egyptian traditions fit within your spiritual framework?

Rudolf Steiner:
Such exposure would align with the Christ impulse as a unifying force. If Jesus engaged with these traditions, it was not to replicate them but to synthesize their wisdom into a higher spiritual truth. His mission was to integrate the divine into the earthly, bringing a universal message of love and redemption.

Moderator:
Before we conclude, let’s reflect: How should we interpret the silence of the canonical texts regarding these years? Dr. Aslan?

Reza Aslan:
The silence reflects the Gospel writers’ focus on Jesus’ public ministry, which they deemed most important. However, it also invites us to consider how his formative years shaped his later mission.

Moderator:
Ms. Armstrong?

Karen Armstrong:
It reminds us that religious texts often prioritize theological over biographical details. The silence encourages us to look beyond scripture to understand the full depth of Jesus’ humanity.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon?

Dolores Cannon:
It’s an invitation to explore alternative narratives. Whether through regression or intuition, we can uncover deeper insights into Jesus’ life and mission.

Moderator:
Mr. Steiner?

Rudolf Steiner:
The silence is profound. It suggests that Jesus’ transformation during these years was deeply spiritual and not easily captured in words. It calls us to approach this period with reverence and imagination.

Moderator:
Thank you all for this enlightening discussion. The lost years of Jesus remain a mystery, but through historical, theological, and esoteric perspectives, we gain a richer understanding of his life and mission. Let us carry these insights forward as we continue to explore the profound legacy of Jesus.

Jesus’ Role as a Revolutionary: Was He a Social Reformer, a Political Leader, or a Spiritual Guide?

Moderator:
Welcome, everyone. Today, we explore an intriguing and often debated question: Was Jesus primarily a social reformer, a political leader, or a spiritual guide? To help us unpack this, we have Reza Aslan, historian and scholar of religions; N.T. Wright, leading New Testament scholar; Amy-Jill Levine, expert in Jewish-Christian relations; and Dolores Cannon, regression therapist and esoteric thinker. Let’s begin with the historical context. Dr. Aslan, what do you think was Jesus’ primary mission?

Reza Aslan:
Thank you. From a historical perspective, Jesus was a revolutionary. He was deeply critical of the socio-political systems of his time, particularly the Roman occupation and the Jewish elite who collaborated with it. His message of the Kingdom of God was not just spiritual but also profoundly political—a call to overturn the existing order and establish a society rooted in justice and equality.

Moderator:
Dr. Wright, how do you view this interpretation from a theological standpoint?

N.T. Wright:
I agree that Jesus challenged the status quo, but his revolution was fundamentally theological. The Kingdom of God he proclaimed was not about replacing Roman rule with another political system but about God’s reign breaking into the world. His teachings and actions—like welcoming the marginalized and healing the sick—pointed to a new creation, where heaven and earth were united under God’s sovereignty.

Moderator:
Ms. Levine, as a scholar of Jewish-Christian relations, how does Jesus’ role fit within the Jewish context of his time?

Amy-Jill Levine:
Jesus was very much a product of his Jewish environment. His teachings on love, justice, and inclusion were deeply rooted in Jewish law and tradition. He wasn’t trying to abolish Judaism but to reform and renew it. His criticism of certain Jewish leaders was not anti-Jewish but a prophetic critique consistent with the tradition of Jewish prophets who called for righteousness and adherence to God’s will.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, your regression sessions delve into the spiritual dimensions of Jesus’ mission. How do you interpret his role?

Dolores Cannon:
Through regression insights, it’s clear that Jesus came as a spiritual guide with a universal mission. While his teachings addressed the injustices of his time, his primary goal was to elevate human consciousness and awaken people to their divine potential. His message transcends politics and religion, focusing on love, forgiveness, and spiritual transformation.

Moderator:
Dr. Aslan, how do you respond to the idea that Jesus’ mission was more spiritual than political?

Reza Aslan:
I think it’s important to recognize that in Jesus’ time, the political and spiritual were inseparable. Declaring the Kingdom of God was a direct challenge to Roman imperial authority. His actions—like overturning the money changers’ tables in the temple—had profound political implications. To the Romans, he was a political threat, which is why he was executed as a criminal.

Moderator:
Dr. Wright, would you agree with that assessment of Jesus’ death?

N.T. Wright:
Yes and no. Jesus’ death was undoubtedly political from Rome’s perspective—they saw him as a potential rebel. However, from a theological standpoint, his crucifixion was the climax of his mission. It was the moment when he took upon himself the weight of human sin and inaugurated the new covenant between God and humanity.

Moderator:
Ms. Levine, how does Jesus’ relationship with Jewish authorities fit into this revolutionary narrative?

Amy-Jill Levine:
It’s often overstated. Jesus’ critique of certain Jewish leaders was not unique—other Jewish teachers of the time made similar critiques. He was challenging specific practices, not Judaism as a whole. His revolutionary message was more about internal transformation and faithfulness to God’s commandments than about overthrowing religious authority.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, does your esoteric work suggest Jesus foresaw his death as part of a larger mission?

Dolores Cannon:
Yes, absolutely. Regression insights reveal that Jesus was fully aware of his destiny. He knew his death would serve as a powerful symbol of love and forgiveness, catalyzing a spiritual awakening for humanity. His actions were intentional, designed to leave a lasting impact on the world’s consciousness.

Moderator:
Before we conclude, let’s reflect on this: If Jesus were alive today, how might he address modern socio-political issues? Dr. Aslan?

Reza Aslan:
Jesus would undoubtedly stand with the marginalized and oppressed, challenging systems of power and inequality. His message would remain radical, advocating for justice and human dignity in the face of modern empires.

Moderator:
Dr. Wright?

N.T. Wright:
I believe Jesus would call us to align our lives with God’s purposes. He would emphasize reconciliation, care for the poor, and stewardship of creation as essential to living in God’s kingdom.

Moderator:
Ms. Levine?

Amy-Jill Levine:
Jesus would continue to teach love and compassion as the highest expressions of faithfulness to God. His message would transcend divisions, inviting people of all backgrounds to live in harmony and righteousness.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon?

Dolores Cannon:
Jesus would remind us of our divine potential and encourage us to create a world rooted in love, forgiveness, and spiritual awakening. He would focus on unity, helping humanity transcend conflict and division.

Moderator:
Thank you all for this enlightening discussion. Jesus’ role as a revolutionary—whether social, political, or spiritual—continues to inspire and challenge us. His message remains as relevant today as it was 2,000 years ago. Let us reflect on how we can embody his teachings in our own lives.

The Evolution of Jesus’ Message: How Has It Been Interpreted (or Misinterpreted) Over Time?

Moderator:
Welcome, everyone. Today, we’re exploring how Jesus’ message has evolved—or been misinterpreted—over the centuries. Joining us are Albert Schweitzer, theologian and philosopher; Bart Ehrman, historian and expert on early Christianity; Karen Armstrong, comparative religion scholar; and Dolores Cannon, regression therapist and esoteric thinker. Let’s begin with the historical interpretation. Dr. Ehrman, how has Jesus’ message evolved over time?

Bart Ehrman:
Thank you. Jesus’ original message focused on the imminent arrival of God’s Kingdom, which he believed would bring justice and divine rule on Earth. After his death, his followers reinterpreted this message in light of his resurrection, shifting the focus from an apocalyptic event to salvation through faith in him. Over centuries, theological doctrines like the Trinity and the atonement further transformed his teachings.

Moderator:
Ms. Armstrong, would you agree that theological developments have shifted the focus of Jesus’ message?

Karen Armstrong:
Absolutely. Jesus’ teachings emphasized compassion, forgiveness, and love of neighbor—simple yet profound principles rooted in his Jewish faith. Over time, institutional Christianity emphasized dogma and creeds, sometimes overshadowing his ethical teachings. However, these developments also allowed his message to adapt to different cultures and historical contexts.

Moderator:
Dr. Schweitzer, your seminal work critiqued historical interpretations of Jesus. How do you view this evolution?

Albert Schweitzer:
In my view, each era has reshaped Jesus to fit its own image. The 19th-century "historical Jesus" was often presented as a rational moral teacher, stripped of his apocalyptic vision. Yet, his true message was deeply eschatological—he believed he was ushering in the end of the age. Modern interpretations often overlook this.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, your regression work explores esoteric perspectives. How do these interpretations of Jesus differ from traditional ones?

Dolores Cannon:
Esoteric accounts suggest that Jesus’ message was always universal, intended to transcend religion and culture. He came to awaken humanity to its spiritual potential, teaching love and forgiveness as paths to enlightenment. Over time, institutional interpretations often focused more on control and fear than on the empowerment he intended.

Moderator:
Dr. Ehrman, what role did early Church leaders play in shaping—or misinterpreting—Jesus’ message?

Bart Ehrman:
Early Church leaders, like Paul and the Gospel writers, were pivotal in shaping Jesus’ message. They reinterpreted his teachings to address new theological challenges and expand his appeal beyond Jewish audiences. While this allowed Christianity to grow, it also distanced the movement from Jesus’ original apocalyptic focus.

Moderator:
Ms. Armstrong, how has Jesus’ message been used—positively or negatively—throughout history?

Karen Armstrong:
Jesus’ message of love and compassion has inspired remarkable acts of charity and social justice. However, it has also been co-opted to justify oppression and violence, such as during the Crusades or colonialism. These misuses often stem from prioritizing power over his core ethical teachings.

Moderator:
Dr. Schweitzer, do you think Jesus’ eschatological vision is relevant today, or has it been replaced by new interpretations?

Albert Schweitzer:
His eschatological vision remains relevant, but it requires a reimagining. Modern Christians might interpret the Kingdom of God not as an apocalyptic event but as a call to transform the world through love and service. This aligns with his emphasis on living in anticipation of God’s justice.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, does your esoteric work suggest a reinterpretation of Jesus’ message for modern times?

Dolores Cannon:
Yes. The esoteric perspective sees Jesus as a teacher of universal truths that resonate today more than ever. His emphasis on raising consciousness and creating a world of love and unity is vital for addressing modern challenges like division and conflict.

Moderator:
Before we close, let’s reflect on how we might recover the essence of Jesus’ message in our time. Dr. Ehrman?

Bart Ehrman:
We need to focus on what is historically plausible about Jesus’ teachings—his call for justice, humility, and care for the marginalized. Stripping away later theological layers can help us connect with his original vision.

Moderator:
Ms. Armstrong?

Karen Armstrong:
I believe we can recover Jesus’ essence by emphasizing compassion and interfaith dialogue. His message is not exclusive; it invites all people to live ethically and in harmony with one another.

Moderator:
Dr. Schweitzer?

Albert Schweitzer:
We must live as Jesus’ followers, embodying his call to love and serve others selflessly. By doing so, we bring his vision of the Kingdom of God closer to reality.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon?

Dolores Cannon:
Humanity must embrace the universal principles Jesus taught—love, forgiveness, and the realization of our divine nature. His message is timeless, and its true power lies in spiritual transformation.

Moderator:
Thank you all for this enriching discussion. The evolution of Jesus’ message reminds us of its adaptability and enduring relevance. Whether interpreted historically, theologically, or esoterically, it continues to inspire reflection and transformation. Let us strive to embody his teachings in our lives.

The Legacy of Jesus: How Would He View Modern Society?

Moderator:
Welcome, everyone. Today’s discussion centers on an intriguing question: How would Jesus view modern society and respond to its challenges? Joining us are N.T. Wright, leading New Testament scholar; Dolores Cannon, regression therapist and esoteric thinker; Carl Jung, renowned psychologist; and Reza Aslan, historian and religious scholar. Let’s begin with an overview. Dr. Wright, what do you think Jesus’ primary concerns would be if he were alive today?

N.T. Wright:
Thank you. I believe Jesus would be deeply concerned about inequality, injustice, and the neglect of the vulnerable. His teachings consistently emphasized care for the poor, justice for the oppressed, and the establishment of God’s Kingdom on Earth. Today, he might call for a renewed focus on community, reconciliation, and stewardship of creation.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, from your esoteric perspective, what would Jesus’ focus be in the modern world?

Dolores Cannon:
From an esoteric standpoint, Jesus would focus on raising humanity’s consciousness. He would encourage us to move away from fear, division, and materialism and embrace love, forgiveness, and spiritual growth. His teachings were always universal, and in today’s world, they are more relevant than ever as a path toward unity and harmony.

Moderator:
Dr. Jung, how might Jesus’ archetypal role influence modern society?

Carl Jung:
Jesus represents the archetype of the Self—the union of opposites, such as divinity and humanity, light and shadow. In modern society, where individuals often feel fragmented and disconnected, his story offers a model for integration and wholeness. He would likely urge us to confront our collective shadow, including greed, intolerance, and environmental destruction.

Moderator:
Dr. Aslan, do you see Jesus addressing socio-political structures in the modern world?

Reza Aslan:
Absolutely. Jesus was a revolutionary who challenged the oppressive structures of his time, and I believe he would do the same today. He would stand against systemic inequality, racism, and exploitation, calling for a radical reimagining of our political and economic systems to align with principles of justice and compassion.

Moderator:
How might Jesus respond to environmental issues? Dr. Wright?

N.T. Wright:
Jesus’ emphasis on stewardship and the interconnectedness of creation suggests he would be deeply troubled by climate change and environmental degradation. He would remind us that caring for the Earth is part of our responsibility as stewards of God’s creation, urging us to act with urgency and compassion.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon, does the esoteric perspective align with this view?

Dolores Cannon:
Yes, absolutely. Regression insights suggest that Jesus viewed the Earth as sacred, a gift to be cherished and protected. He would likely advocate for a profound shift in how we relate to the planet, encouraging sustainable practices and a deeper respect for nature’s balance.

Moderator:
Dr. Jung, how might Jesus address modern psychological challenges, such as anxiety, depression, and loneliness?

Carl Jung:
Jesus’ teachings offer a path to psychological wholeness. His emphasis on love and community provides an antidote to the isolation and alienation many feel today. His story reminds us that suffering can lead to transformation, offering hope and purpose even in the face of life’s difficulties.

Moderator:
Dr. Aslan, how do you think Jesus would navigate interfaith conflicts in today’s world?

Reza Aslan:
Jesus’ message was one of inclusion and love, transcending religious and cultural boundaries. I believe he would promote interfaith dialogue and mutual respect, challenging dogma and exclusivity. He would remind us that the essence of faith is love and that it should unite, not divide, humanity.

Moderator:
Let’s reflect on how Jesus might inspire change today. Dr. Wright?

N.T. Wright:
Jesus would call us to live out the principles of the Kingdom of God: justice, mercy, humility, and love. He would inspire us to build communities that reflect these values, bringing healing to a broken world.

Moderator:
Ms. Cannon?

Dolores Cannon:
Jesus would inspire us to awaken to our higher selves, emphasizing that we are all connected and capable of profound love and transformation. His message would guide humanity toward a collective spiritual awakening.

Moderator:
Dr. Jung?

Carl Jung:
Jesus would urge us to confront our inner and outer shadows, offering a path toward integration and wholeness. He represents the possibility of transformation, not just for individuals but for society as a whole.

Moderator:
Dr. Aslan?

Reza Aslan:
Jesus would challenge us to reimagine our systems and relationships, demanding justice and compassion in all aspects of life. He would remind us that true faith is lived through action, particularly in service to the marginalized.

Moderator:
Thank you all for this enlightening discussion. Whether as a social reformer, spiritual guide, or archetypal figure, Jesus’ message continues to resonate in profound ways. Let us take his legacy as a call to action in addressing the challenges of our time.

Short Bios:

Pope Francis: Current leader of the Catholic Church, known for his emphasis on humility, social justice, and interfaith dialogue.

N.T. Wright: Renowned New Testament scholar and theologian, specializing in the historical and theological understanding of Jesus.

Bart Ehrman: Historian and expert on early Christianity, focusing on the historical Jesus and the evolution of Christian beliefs.

Dolores Cannon: Hypnotherapist and regressionist who explored esoteric insights into Jesus’ life and mission through past-life regressions.

Carl Jung: Swiss psychologist and founder of analytical psychology, interpreting Jesus as a universal archetype within the collective unconscious.

Reza Aslan: Religious scholar and author, offering historical and interfaith perspectives on Jesus as a revolutionary figure.

Amy-Jill Levine: Jewish scholar of the New Testament, bridging Jewish-Christian understanding and contextualizing Jesus within first-century Judaism.

Karen Armstrong: Comparative religion expert, exploring the broader implications of Jesus’ teachings across faiths and cultures.

Albert Schweitzer: Theologian and philosopher who critiqued historical interpretations of Jesus, emphasizing his eschatological vision.

Rudolf Steiner: Mystic and founder of anthroposophy, presenting Jesus as a spiritual figure embodying universal truths.