|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Hello, everyone! Today, we’re diving into a topic that’s complex, controversial, and deeply impactful—gender identity and adolescent care. This conversation brings together voices from across the spectrum who each bring their expertise, insights, and unique perspectives on how gender identity is understood and treated, especially for young people.
We’re honored to have with us Abigail Shrier, author of Irreversible Damage, who’s sparked essential conversations around therapy models, the influence of social media, and the role of parents. We’ll also hear from Dr. Lisa Littman, whose research on rapid onset gender dysphoria has made waves in how we understand the social aspects of gender identity. Alongside her is Dr. Jordan Peterson, a champion of free speech who raises vital questions about open discourse in academia and healthcare. Helen Joyce, a journalist who’s critically examined the influence of gender ideology, will share her perspective on the impact of activism and censorship.
And we’re not stopping there. Experts like Dr. Kenneth Zucker, known for his investigative approach to therapy, and Dr. Marci Bowers, a leader in gender-affirming surgery, will bring their voices to this conversation. Together, they’ll cover everything from family dynamics and mental health to the ethical considerations of medical interventions for adolescents.
So, this is more than just an imaginary discussion; it’s a deep dive into one of today’s most pressing and sensitive issues. Let’s listen closely, lean into the perspectives of these thought leaders, and open ourselves up to a conversation that could reshape our understanding of gender, therapy, and the role of family.
The Role of Social Influence in Adolescent Gender Identity
Nick Sasaki: Welcome, everyone. Today, we’re diving into a topic that’s both timely and complex—how social influences, particularly among adolescents, play a role in shaping gender identity. This conversation is essential as it touches on youth mental health, social dynamics, and personal identity in ways we’re still working to fully understand. Thank you all for being here.
To start, Abigail, your book Irreversible Damage sparked considerable dialogue about the social contagion theory and its impact on adolescent girls. Could you briefly share what led you to explore this angle?
Abigail Shrier: Thank you, Nick. My interest began when I noticed a striking trend: a sudden surge in teenage girls declaring transgender identities without a prior history of gender dysphoria. Many of these cases emerged in clusters, almost like a social phenomenon. It seemed that, for some, identifying as transgender was influenced by social circles and online communities, especially as they navigated adolescence and the challenges that come with it.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail. Dr. Littman, you’re known for coining the term “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” (ROGD). How does your research support or challenge Abigail’s observations about social influence?
Dr. Lisa Littman: Absolutely, Nick. Through my research, I found patterns suggesting that social influence could be a factor in the recent rise of gender dysphoria diagnoses among adolescents, particularly among girls. In interviews, parents reported that their children suddenly expressed gender dysphoria after several of their friends identified as transgender. These observations don’t dismiss genuine cases of gender dysphoria but highlight the need to consider social dynamics in the diagnostic process.
Nick Sasaki: That’s fascinating. Dr. Haidt, you’ve done extensive research on the impact of social media on youth. What’s your perspective on how platforms like Instagram and TikTok might contribute to identity exploration, especially around gender?
Dr. Jonathan Haidt: Thanks, Nick. Social media has amplified the visibility of certain identities, making them more accessible and seemingly “normal” to young people exploring their sense of self. These platforms often reward attention-grabbing content, which can include narratives around personal transformation and identity. Adolescents, whose brains are wired to seek social validation, can be especially vulnerable to this. Social media can create an echo chamber effect, where certain identities or experiences become highly validated, even if they don’t fully align with a young person’s true feelings.
Nick Sasaki: Very insightful, Dr. Haidt. Dr. Anderson, as someone who works directly with transgender youth, what do you make of these concerns around social contagion? Do you see social influence impacting how young people view their gender identity?
Dr. Erica Anderson: Thanks, Nick. I do think we’re seeing an unprecedented role for social influence, both online and offline, in how adolescents understand themselves. But it’s also important to distinguish between exploration and permanence. Adolescents have always experimented with different identities; what’s new is that some forms of exploration are leading to early, sometimes irreversible, medical interventions. This is where I think we need to be cautious—validating young people’s identities without rushing medical or life-altering decisions.
Nick Sasaki: That brings us to a key question: What role should parents, educators, and therapists play in helping adolescents navigate these social influences? Abigail, any thoughts on this?
Abigail Shrier: Parents and educators need to be engaged, listening closely without jumping to affirm or dismiss. Adolescence is a turbulent time, and it’s easy for young people to be swayed by external factors. Parents should encourage open dialogue, help their children understand that it’s okay to question without committing, and work alongside professionals who respect this careful approach.
Dr. Lisa Littman: I agree with Abigail. Therapists and educators should foster a space where adolescents feel safe to explore their thoughts without pressure to conform to any identity. Rushing to label or affirm can sometimes bypass crucial discussions about underlying mental health issues, like anxiety or depression, that might be driving the desire for change.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Haidt, considering what Dr. Littman just mentioned, what would be a balanced approach to handling social media’s impact on identity?
Dr. Jonathan Haidt: It’s challenging because social media isn’t going away. I’d advocate for teaching media literacy and emotional resilience in schools so that young people can critically analyze what they see online. Educators and parents can encourage students to think critically about online narratives and understand that what they see on social media is often curated and does not necessarily represent reality.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Anderson, what about you? What’s a balanced way forward for parents and professionals working with youth?
Dr. Erica Anderson: A key is helping young people understand that identity is not a one-size-fits-all journey, and exploration doesn’t need to be rushed. Encourage patience. Adolescents are going through so many changes, and while social influences are inevitable, we can teach them to understand and navigate these influences responsibly. We should always be there as guides, not dictators.
Nick Sasaki: It sounds like we’re all recognizing the need for a middle ground—a place where young people feel supported in their journey without being pushed to definitive labels too soon. This has been a deeply enriching conversation.
Thank you, Abigail, Dr. Littman, Dr. Haidt, and Dr. Anderson, for sharing your expertise and perspectives. The balance between social influence and personal identity is challenging, but conversations like this bring us closer to a more nuanced understanding.
This conversation opens up further questions and insights, encouraging ongoing exploration of these vital issues. Each expert brings a unique perspective, creating a rich, layered discussion around social influences and adolescent identity formation.
Medicalization and Ethical Considerations in Gender Dysphoria Treatment
Nick Sasaki: Welcome back, everyone. In our last conversation, we explored how social influences shape adolescent gender identity. Today, we're diving into the medical and ethical side of the discussion—specifically, the increasing medicalization of gender dysphoria treatment among young people.
Abigail, your book raised significant concerns about medical interventions like hormone therapy and surgeries for adolescents. Can you share some of the ethical questions you believe we should be asking?
Abigail Shrier: Certainly, Nick. I think one of the biggest questions we face is: Are we rushing young people into permanent, life-altering decisions before they’re equipped to fully understand the consequences? Many of these treatments—such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy—can have irreversible effects. Adolescence is a period of exploration, yet we’re offering solutions that are permanent.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail. Dr. Hruz, as a pediatric endocrinologist, you’re closely connected to the medical aspects of these treatments. What are your thoughts on the current standards for administering these interventions to minors?
Dr. Paul Hruz: Thanks, Nick. From a medical perspective, we must be very cautious, especially when it comes to treatments that impact physical development in ways we don’t fully understand long-term. Puberty blockers, for example, halt the natural progression of puberty, which plays a significant role in brain development and overall health. In my opinion, the standards of care for minors need to be rooted in rigorous evidence, yet much of what we know remains uncertain.
Nick Sasaki: Interesting. Dr. Bowers, you’re a highly respected surgeon in this field and a pioneer in gender-affirming surgeries. From your perspective, what safeguards should be in place to ensure that young people make informed decisions?
Dr. Marci Bowers: Thank you, Nick. While I strongly believe in the importance of gender-affirming care, I also think we have a duty to ensure that adolescents understand the full impact of these medical choices. For instance, there’s an increasing awareness that minors need a more thorough and individualized evaluation process. Each young person’s situation is unique, and I believe we need to prioritize their holistic well-being, taking as much time as necessary before making irreversible medical changes.
Nick Sasaki: That’s a very thoughtful approach. Dr. Levine, you’ve been vocal about the need for informed consent. Can you expand on how informed consent should ideally work in the context of adolescent gender dysphoria?
Dr. Stephen B. Levine: Certainly, Nick. Informed consent is crucial but complicated here. For any medical intervention, especially one with permanent effects, the patient must fully understand the risks, benefits, and unknowns. With adolescents, achieving this level of understanding is challenging—they’re still developing the cognitive and emotional maturity needed for such decisions. I’d argue that we need more robust consent procedures, perhaps involving a waiting period or comprehensive psychological evaluations to ensure minors genuinely grasp the implications.
Nick Sasaki: This raises another question about standards. Abigail, do you think the healthcare industry is adequately addressing the need for these informed, careful approaches in youth transitioning?
Abigail Shrier: In my view, Nick, the industry is often moving too quickly. I understand the drive to support young people who are struggling, but there’s a fine line between support and affirmation leading to medicalization. I think many healthcare providers are rushing to affirm, often without probing deeply into whether these feelings may change as the adolescent grows. There’s a pressure to act quickly that I believe undermines the care young people truly need.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Hruz, what are the potential long-term impacts of these treatments on adolescents?
Dr. Paul Hruz: The long-term impacts are still largely unknown, which is part of the concern. For example, cross-sex hormones can affect cardiovascular health, bone density, and even fertility. With adolescents, these treatments could interfere with the natural development processes, including neurological development. While short-term benefits may be reported, the lack of longitudinal data means we may be missing critical risks.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Bowers, what’s your perspective on balancing the immediate relief that gender-affirming care can provide with the unknowns that Dr. Hruz mentioned?
Dr. Marci Bowers: It’s definitely a balancing act, Nick. I have seen firsthand how gender-affirming care can bring relief to individuals experiencing severe dysphoria. For many, especially adults, these interventions are truly life-changing in a positive way. But with adolescents, it’s different. Their identities are still forming, and their mental health is often more fragile. We’re just beginning to see research on long-term outcomes, and until we have clearer data, I think caution is warranted. This is why I support a more rigorous evaluation process, with an emphasis on gradual, reversible steps when possible.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Levine, considering what Dr. Bowers just shared, what role do you see mental health evaluations playing in this process? Should they be standardized or more individualized?
Dr. Stephen B. Levine: Mental health evaluations should be both thorough and individualized, Nick. Standardized assessments might help in identifying general risk factors, but they don’t capture the complexities of each adolescent’s unique situation. Every young person struggling with gender dysphoria may have different underlying issues—whether it’s anxiety, depression, trauma, or even social influences. A personalized evaluation can uncover these factors, which can be essential in guiding whether or not medical intervention is the right path, or if a more exploratory, therapeutic approach should be prioritized first.
Nick Sasaki: That makes sense. Abigail, you’ve spoken about the psychological journey adolescents go through. How do you believe mental health evaluations should integrate into the decision-making process?
Abigail Shrier: I think they should play a foundational role, Nick. Adolescence is inherently challenging, with so much turbulence and change. Mental health evaluations should assess not just the immediate feelings of gender dysphoria but the broader psychological landscape. Are there co-occurring issues like social anxiety, depression, or body image struggles? In many cases, addressing these issues first might help adolescents find greater clarity about their identity, potentially reducing the need for immediate medical intervention.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail. Dr. Hruz, based on your experience, what safeguards or steps would you recommend for healthcare providers to ensure responsible treatment practices for adolescents?
Dr. Paul Hruz: It’s essential to adopt a multi-disciplinary approach, Nick. First, I’d recommend a comprehensive psychological assessment to understand the full scope of the individual’s mental and emotional health. Next, there should be a strong emphasis on informed consent—not just for the adolescent but with parental involvement. And finally, I believe in encouraging a period of reflection before making irreversible decisions. Rushing into treatments, especially those with permanent consequences, can be detrimental, and taking time allows for a more considered, thoughtful approach.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Bowers, I’d like to bring this back to you. Given your experience with surgeries, do you think a “reflection period” is necessary, or could it add undue distress for adolescents experiencing intense dysphoria?
Dr. Marci Bowers: It’s a valid question, Nick. On one hand, we don’t want to prolong suffering for someone in genuine need of intervention. But on the other, I believe a reflection period is actually a form of compassionate care—it allows the adolescent to adjust to the idea, weigh their options, and ensure they’re prepared for the journey ahead. When a young person truly understands what’s involved and still chooses to proceed, the outcome is often more positive.
Nick Sasaki: It seems like all of you agree on the importance of a careful, thoughtful approach. Dr. Levine, how do you think the healthcare industry can shift towards these more cautious standards while still supporting those who feel urgent needs?
Dr. Stephen B. Levine: The key lies in balancing empathy with prudence. I think the healthcare industry could benefit from setting age-related guidelines, similar to other fields where major decisions are made—there’s often a legal age or maturity benchmark. Additionally, by fostering a collaborative approach that includes mental health professionals, endocrinologists, and family members, we can build a framework that’s supportive but not hasty.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Dr. Levine. Abigail, any final thoughts on how we can better balance empathy and caution in treating adolescent gender dysphoria?
Abigail Shrier: I think we must remember that support doesn’t always mean immediate action. Sometimes the most supportive thing we can do is to give young people space, time, and guidance as they work through complex emotions. Rather than viewing it as “doing nothing,” I see it as an active form of care, where the adolescent feels valued, heard, and given room to grow without feeling pressured to make permanent decisions right away.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail, and thank you all—Dr. Hruz, Dr. Bowers, and Dr. Levine—for your insights. This discussion on medicalization and ethics reminds us that care is about more than just treatments; it’s about safeguarding young people’s futures in a thoughtful, compassionate way. This has been a truly enlightening conversation.
This segment continues the thoughtful exploration of medical ethics, caution, and empathy in treating adolescent gender dysphoria, with each expert providing unique insights into how healthcare practices can balance these complex elements.
Affirmation-Only Therapy vs. Investigative Therapeutic Approaches
Nick Sasaki: Welcome back, everyone. Our last discussion touched on the medical aspects and ethical considerations around gender dysphoria treatment for young people. Today, we’re shifting to another important aspect: therapy models. Specifically, we’ll explore the "affirmation-only" approach versus more investigative therapeutic approaches.
Abigail, your book questions the affirmation-only model, especially when it comes to adolescent care. Could you start us off by sharing your concerns?
Abigail Shrier: Thank you, Nick. My main concern is that the affirmation-only model might rush young people into accepting a new gender identity without enough exploration of their internal struggles. Adolescence is often turbulent, and these feelings can be complex. An approach that immediately affirms without examining the full emotional landscape might bypass essential insights, potentially leading young people down a path that isn’t right for them.
Nick Sasaki: Thanks for that, Abigail. Dr. Zucker, as a clinical psychologist specializing in gender dysphoria, you’ve been an advocate for an investigative, exploratory approach to therapy. Could you explain why you believe this approach is beneficial?
Dr. Kenneth Zucker: Certainly, Nick. In my view, an investigative approach allows us to explore the deeper, often multifaceted issues that might be influencing a young person’s experience of gender dysphoria. This could include family dynamics, social pressures, and even underlying mental health issues like depression or anxiety. By examining these areas, we provide adolescents with the tools to better understand themselves, helping them make more informed decisions about their identity over time.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Ehrensaft, you’re known for supporting the affirmation model and have worked extensively with gender-diverse youth. Could you share your perspective on why affirmation is crucial in therapeutic settings?
Dr. Diane Ehrensaft: Of course, Nick. The affirmation model is grounded in the belief that each individual’s understanding of their own gender identity should be respected and supported. For many young people, having their gender identity affirmed by family, peers, and professionals reduces mental health struggles and fosters a stronger sense of self. In my experience, affirmation allows adolescents to feel seen and validated, which can be incredibly healing, especially for those who’ve struggled with dysphoria.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Dr. Ehrensaft. Dr. Drescher, you’ve worked extensively on LGBTQ+ mental health. What’s your take on the affirmation model versus an investigative approach in therapy?
Dr. Jack Drescher: This is a complex issue, Nick. I believe that both models have their place. Affirmation is crucial in creating a supportive, nonjudgmental environment. However, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t explore underlying issues. I think the real question is balance. Affirmation doesn’t necessarily have to exclude exploration. Therapists can affirm a young person’s experiences while also helping them explore various facets of their identity in a non-intrusive way.
Nick Sasaki: It sounds like there may be a middle ground between affirmation and exploration. Dr. Zucker, do you believe it’s possible to integrate affirmation into an investigative approach?
Dr. Kenneth Zucker: Yes, I do. Affirmation can be part of creating a safe space for adolescents to open up. But from my perspective, affirmation shouldn’t mean unquestioning acceptance of every feeling or statement a young person makes about their identity. I’d argue that exploration helps adolescents to not only understand their gender but also how it fits within their overall mental and emotional landscape. In many cases, I’ve seen this approach lead to greater clarity and well-being for the individual.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Ehrensaft, how do you view this idea of combining affirmation with exploration? Can they coexist without creating confusion for the young person?
Dr. Diane Ehrensaft: I think they can coexist, but it’s essential to prioritize the young person’s experience. When we affirm, we let the child or adolescent know that we trust their self-knowledge. However, gentle exploration can be valuable, especially if done without making the young person feel doubted. The key is that exploration should always be led by the adolescent’s needs and comfort levels, not by a therapist’s assumptions.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Drescher, you mentioned balance earlier. Could you elaborate on what a balanced approach might look like in practice?
Dr. Jack Drescher: In practice, a balanced approach would involve creating an open, affirming environment where adolescents feel free to explore and express their identity, while also gently examining other aspects of their life that might be contributing to their feelings. For instance, discussing how social pressures or family dynamics play a role could provide context without invalidating their identity. In this way, adolescents feel supported, but they’re also empowered to think critically about their experiences.
Nick Sasaki: That’s very insightful. Abigail, do you feel that this kind of integrated approach could address some of the concerns you raised in your book?
Abigail Shrier: Absolutely, Nick. My primary concern has always been that young people are given time and space to understand themselves fully before making any life-altering decisions. An integrated approach—one that affirms while still exploring underlying issues—strikes me as far more responsible. It respects the adolescent’s experience while also acknowledging the complexities of adolescence.
Nick Sasaki: It seems there’s a consensus that both affirmation and exploration have roles in therapy, and that the key is finding a careful, balanced approach. Dr. Ehrensaft, any final thoughts on this integration?
Dr. Diane Ehrensaft: Yes, I’d just add that as therapists, we must remember that each young person’s journey is unique. Our role should be to walk alongside them, providing affirmation where needed and helping them explore as they’re ready. It’s about meeting them where they are, with sensitivity and respect for their own sense of self.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Zucker, Dr. Drescher, any final words?
Dr. Kenneth Zucker: I’d emphasize that taking a balanced approach benefits everyone. It allows therapists to provide the support young people need while also ensuring that all aspects of their mental health are considered. It’s the difference between supporting someone and rushing them.
Dr. Jack Drescher: And I’d add that this balance is vital not just for the adolescent but for families too. By working together, we can ensure young people receive the most comprehensive, compassionate care possible.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Dr. Ehrensaft, Dr. Zucker, Dr. Drescher, and Abigail. This has been an enlightening discussion. Today’s insights remind us that therapy isn’t about a single model but about adapting to the needs of each individual, providing affirmation and exploration as tools to support healthy development.
This conversation captures the nuances and potential for integrating affirmation and exploration, with each expert contributing a thoughtful approach to creating balanced, individualized therapy for young people exploring their gender identity.
Parental Involvement and Family Dynamics in Adolescent Gender Transitions
Nick Sasaki: Welcome back, everyone. In our previous discussion, we explored the balance between affirmation and exploration in therapy for adolescents dealing with gender dysphoria. Today, we’re diving into an equally critical topic: the role of parents and family dynamics in adolescent gender transitions.
Abigail, your book raises concerns about parental exclusion in the therapeutic process. Could you start us off by sharing why you feel it’s so important to keep parents involved?
Abigail Shrier: Thank you, Nick. For me, it’s essential because parents know their children deeply and have an understanding of their personalities, struggles, and family history that therapists or doctors may not fully capture. Adolescence can be a confusing time, and parents can provide a stabilizing influence. When they’re excluded from their child’s journey, it not only disrupts family dynamics but can also leave young people feeling isolated or misunderstood. In many cases, parents want to support their children but are denied the chance to do so.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail. Dr. Grossman, as a psychiatrist who has spoken about the role of family in mental health, what’s your perspective on involving parents in discussions about gender dysphoria?
Dr. Miriam Grossman: Thanks, Nick. In my view, involving parents is essential, not only for the child’s mental health but for the family’s overall cohesion. Family dynamics play a huge role in adolescents’ emotional and psychological development. Excluding parents risks undermining the foundation of trust that should be present in any family. Additionally, parents are often best equipped to provide the ongoing emotional support that young people need. In cases of gender dysphoria, where the journey can be long and complex, parental involvement ensures there’s a support system beyond the therapy room.
Nick Sasaki: That’s a great point. Dr. Leibowitz, you specialize in working with transgender youth and often advocate for family-centered care. How do you approach parental involvement in your practice?
Dr. Scott Leibowitz: Thank you, Nick. In my practice, I view parents as partners in the therapeutic process. My approach is to educate parents and involve them as much as possible. Adolescents are going through significant changes, and having family support can be invaluable. However, I also recognize that there are cases where family dynamics can be complicated. In those cases, my goal is to mediate and help families find a common ground, where parents feel they’re contributing positively to their child’s journey, even if they don’t always understand or agree.
Nick Sasaki: That’s an interesting perspective, Dr. Leibowitz. Walt, you’ve often spoken about the importance of family in understanding and supporting adolescents with gender dysphoria. From your own experience, what role do you think families should play?
Walt Heyer: Thanks, Nick. Family support is crucial. When I struggled with my gender identity, I felt isolated and misunderstood, and I didn’t have family support to lean on. In hindsight, I realize that parental involvement and a family-centered approach could have helped me navigate my feelings differently. Parents provide a sense of continuity and love that adolescents need, especially during times of identity exploration. Excluding them from the process can make a young person feel adrift, without guidance or grounding.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you for that perspective, Walt. Dr. Grossman, do you think there’s an ideal way for parents to approach their child’s gender exploration? How can they be involved without making the child feel pressured?
Dr. Miriam Grossman: That’s a great question, Nick. I think it’s about fostering open communication without judgment. Parents should be there as listeners first, allowing their children to express their feelings without fear of reprimand. But it’s also fair for parents to ask questions and explore why their child feels the way they do. This approach provides a balance—parents are present and engaged, but they’re not overwhelming the adolescent with expectations or skepticism. It’s about making sure the child feels both understood and supported.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Leibowitz, how do you guide families to achieve that balance? What strategies have you found effective in helping parents become supportive allies?
Dr. Scott Leibowitz: One of the strategies I use is encouraging parents to educate themselves. The more they understand gender dysphoria, the better equipped they are to support their child empathetically. I also recommend family counseling sessions, where everyone has the opportunity to share their feelings in a safe environment. This can be incredibly helpful in defusing tensions and building understanding. Ultimately, parents need to know they’re not just bystanders—they have an active role to play, but it must be guided by empathy and patience.
Nick Sasaki: Abigail, in your view, what’s the biggest challenge parents face when their child is exploring their gender identity, and how can they overcome it?
Abigail Shrier: I think the biggest challenge for parents is fear—the fear of losing their child or damaging the relationship by saying the “wrong” thing. Many parents worry that by asking questions or expressing concerns, they’ll be seen as unsupportive. My advice to parents is to approach the situation with honest curiosity and love. Ask questions, share your feelings, and express your desire to understand. Remember that it’s okay to be concerned; it’s natural. The key is to communicate these concerns in a way that reinforces your commitment to your child.
Nick Sasaki: That’s very insightful, Abigail. Walt, based on your experience, do you have any advice for parents navigating these challenging conversations?
Walt Heyer: Yes, Nick. I would say that parents should stay connected and stay informed. Don’t withdraw just because the topic feels difficult. Sometimes, just being present and showing that you care is enough. Also, if a parent feels overwhelmed, I encourage them to seek support too—whether it’s from other parents, support groups, or mental health professionals. Navigating this journey isn’t easy, but having a strong support system can make a huge difference for both parents and adolescents.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Grossman, do you have any final thoughts on how family dynamics can be strengthened during a child’s gender exploration?
Dr. Miriam Grossman: I think family bonds can become stronger through open, honest dialogue. It’s important to remember that parents and children are on a journey together. When families communicate and genuinely try to understand each other, they build resilience. Even if there are disagreements or difficult moments, the act of working through them together can deepen family connections.
Nick Sasaki: And Dr. Leibowitz, any closing thoughts?
Dr. Scott Leibowitz: I’d just emphasize the importance of patience. Gender exploration can be a long, evolving process. By being patient and supportive, families can create an environment where adolescents feel free to grow and discover themselves without feeling rushed. It’s about trust and unconditional support.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, everyone—Abigail, Dr. Grossman, Dr. Leibowitz, and Walt. Today’s conversation has highlighted the vital role of family in supporting adolescents through identity exploration. With understanding, patience, and open dialogue, families can provide the steady support that young people need as they navigate these complex experiences.
This conversation emphasizes the importance of family involvement, balancing support with understanding, and the unique challenges families face when a young person explores their gender identity, with each expert offering nuanced strategies and insights.
Censorship, Activism, and Open Discourse in Gender Identity and Healthcare
Nick Sasaki: Welcome back, everyone. Today, we’re diving into a complex yet crucial topic: censorship, activism, and open discourse surrounding gender identity and healthcare. With a topic as sensitive and polarized as this one, there are unique challenges and responsibilities in facilitating open discussion while respecting diverse perspectives.
Abigail, your book faced significant backlash and even calls for censorship. Can you share your experience with this and why you think open discourse on this topic is so challenging?
Abigail Shrier: Thanks, Nick. Yes, the backlash was intense, with some bookstores refusing to carry my book and platforms censoring discussions. I think part of the challenge is that gender identity has become so politically charged that any critical discussion can be misconstrued as “hateful” or “anti-trans.” This can make it difficult to raise genuine concerns or even ask questions. In my view, open discourse is essential, especially when it involves adolescents and medical care. Silencing these conversations ultimately harms those who might benefit from a full range of perspectives.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail. Dr. Peterson, you’ve been outspoken on free speech and censorship issues in academic and social contexts. What’s your perspective on how activism and censorship impact discussions on gender identity?
Dr. Jordan Peterson: Thank you, Nick. I think the problem lies in the conflation of disagreement with disrespect or hatred. Activism has played a role in pushing for essential rights and visibility, but when activism veers into silencing dissenting views, we enter dangerous territory. Censorship doesn’t eliminate the underlying issues—it drives them underground and intensifies them. In my view, we need to create spaces where people can discuss complex issues openly, without fear of repercussions. Only then can we reach a deeper understanding.
Nick Sasaki: Helen, you’ve also faced significant pushback for your book on gender ideology. From your perspective, what’s at stake when open discourse on gender identity and healthcare is restricted?
Helen Joyce: At stake is nothing less than informed, balanced decision-making, Nick. When we stifle open discourse, we limit the information that people—especially young people and their families—have access to. Parents, doctors, and adolescents need a complete picture, which includes both supportive and critical perspectives on medical interventions, therapy models, and the social implications of transitioning. If we can’t speak openly about these issues, we risk making important decisions based on incomplete or one-sided information.
Nick Sasaki: Jesse, you’ve reported extensively on gender issues and have also faced backlash. Can you share your thoughts on the challenges of covering this topic in the media?
Jesse Singal: Absolutely, Nick. Covering gender issues today requires navigating a minefield of public opinion, activist pressures, and institutional policies. One of the biggest challenges is maintaining journalistic neutrality while acknowledging the personal impact of these topics. The pressure to avoid any critical discussion of gender-affirming care or questioning therapeutic models can be intense. But as a journalist, I believe my role is to provide readers with as much context as possible, even if it’s uncomfortable for some audiences. Good journalism means covering all angles and asking tough questions, even when it’s controversial.
Nick Sasaki: Abigail, what role do you think activism should ideally play in shaping healthcare policies around gender identity?
Abigail Shrier: Activism has been crucial in advocating for marginalized groups, but I believe it should inform, not dictate, healthcare policies. Medical decisions, especially those involving young people, should be grounded in rigorous, unbiased research rather than political or ideological pressures. When activism becomes overly prescriptive, it risks prioritizing ideological goals over patient welfare, which should always be the primary focus in healthcare.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Peterson, what are your thoughts on how we can balance activism with maintaining a commitment to open discourse, especially in academia and healthcare?
Dr. Jordan Peterson: In my view, Nick, the key is to reinforce the value of intellectual humility and rigorous debate. Universities, for example, should encourage a diversity of ideas, fostering an environment where people can challenge each other respectfully. Healthcare, too, should be driven by evidence, not ideology. When institutions prioritize ideological conformity over inquiry, they risk undermining both the integrity of education and the quality of patient care. A balanced approach would be to allow activism to bring attention to issues, but to keep the focus on empirical evidence when making policies.
Nick Sasaki: Helen, how do you believe we can foster environments that welcome open dialogue on sensitive issues like gender without crossing into harmful territory?
Helen Joyce: It’s about creating a respectful environment, Nick, one where people are encouraged to speak freely but are also accountable for their words. For example, discussing gender identity and healthcare can be done without denying anyone’s humanity. We can critique ideas and policies while still respecting individuals. One of the things I advocate for is an emphasis on the questions, not on labeling or accusing. When we focus on seeking answers rather than assigning blame, we naturally create a space for constructive dialogue.
Nick Sasaki: Jesse, in your experience, how can journalists and media outlets responsibly cover topics as polarized as gender identity without compromising the quality of discourse?
Jesse Singal: Transparency is key, Nick. Journalists need to be upfront about the limitations of available research, the ongoing debates, and the complexities involved. We should aim to educate the public on both the knowns and unknowns, rather than presenting simplified narratives. Responsible coverage means presenting all sides of the issue, even if some perspectives are controversial, while also making clear that criticism of ideas doesn’t equate to hostility toward individuals.
Nick Sasaki: Abigail, in closing, do you have any advice for others who want to engage in open discourse on gender identity and healthcare?
Abigail Shrier: Yes, I’d say don’t shy away from asking questions and expressing genuine curiosity. We need to be able to engage in these topics without fear of immediate backlash or labels. The more we can approach these discussions with openness and a willingness to listen, the better equipped we’ll be to address these issues thoughtfully and responsibly.
Nick Sasaki: Dr. Peterson, any final thoughts on preserving open discourse in this field?
Dr. Jordan Peterson: I’d just emphasize that we need courage. Courage to speak, courage to listen, and courage to question. Without it, we can’t have true discourse, and without discourse, we can’t arrive at the truth.
Nick Sasaki: Helen, Jesse, any final words?
Helen Joyce: I’d just encourage everyone to value curiosity over certainty. If we approach complex topics with curiosity, we open ourselves to learning and growing, even if the journey is challenging.
Jesse Singal: And I’d add that genuine engagement requires empathy. Understanding the human stories behind these issues—whether they’re from activists, patients, or critics—helps us connect more deeply and approach the topic with the nuance it deserves.
Nick Sasaki: Thank you, Abigail, Dr. Peterson, Helen, and Jesse. This has been an illuminating conversation. Today’s discussion underscores the importance of free, balanced dialogue, and the courage it takes to speak openly in a polarized environment. Thank you all for your insights.
This conversation highlights the challenges and responsibilities of maintaining open discourse on complex topics like gender identity and healthcare, with each expert contributing insights on how activism, empathy, and balanced dialogue can foster better understanding and informed decision-making.
Short Bios:
Abigail Shrier is a journalist and author of Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. Known for her investigative approach, she has sparked significant conversations about social influence, the affirmation-only model in therapy, and the role of parents in adolescent gender identity.
Dr. Lisa Littman is a researcher and physician who coined the term "rapid onset gender dysphoria" (ROGD). Her work focuses on the role of social dynamics and peer influence in gender identity, especially among adolescents.
Dr. Jordan Peterson is a clinical psychologist and professor known for his work on free speech and open discourse in academia. He has raised critical questions about the role of activism in shaping healthcare and societal views on gender identity.
Helen Joyce is a journalist and author of Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality. She critically examines the impact of gender ideology, exploring its effects on societal norms, policy, and healthcare.
Dr. Kenneth Zucker is a clinical psychologist and expert in gender dysphoria who advocates for an investigative approach in therapy. His work emphasizes understanding each adolescent’s unique background before deciding on interventions.
Dr. Marci Bowers is a pioneering surgeon specializing in gender-affirming surgeries. Known for her cautious approach with minors, she advocates for comprehensive evaluations to ensure informed, individualized decisions in gender care.
Dr. Diane Ehrensaft is a developmental psychologist and one of the foremost advocates of the affirmation model in treating gender-diverse youth. She focuses on creating a supportive environment for children and adolescents exploring their gender identity.
Dr. Stephen Levine is a psychiatrist with extensive experience in gender dysphoria treatment, particularly the ethical considerations of medical transitions for minors. He is known for his emphasis on informed consent and patient understanding.
Walt Heyer is an author and speaker who shares his personal experience of gender transition and de-transitioning. He now advocates for a cautious approach to gender transitions, highlighting the importance of family and mental health support.
Dr. Miriam Grossman is a psychiatrist who emphasizes the importance of parental involvement in adolescent mental health, especially around gender identity. She advocates for open family discussions and a balanced approach to care.
Dr. Scott Leibowitz is a child and adolescent psychiatrist specializing in family-centered approaches to treating gender dysphoria. He works to educate parents on supporting their children’s journeys while encouraging family cohesion and understanding.
Jesse Singal is a journalist who writes extensively on gender identity and mental health. Known for his balanced and investigative reporting, he has explored the role of media and public opinion in shaping perceptions of gender and healthcare.
Leave a Reply